Current management of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis across Europe: insights from a multinational expert survey.

OBJECTIVES

Real-world practice patterns of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) remain poorly defined. This study aimed to describe current diagnostic and therapeutic approaches across experienced European centres, identifying areas of convergence and variability to inform future standardization of care.

METHODS

We distributed a 44-item online survey covering diagnostic evaluation, treatment strategies, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and the role of patient advocacy groups. The survey was reviewed by an expert panel and disseminated within the European EGPA Study Group. Responses were collected anonymously between April and August 2025 for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-four experts from six countries participated, most with long-standing experience and substantial EGPA caseloads. Multidisciplinary care and screening for cardiac and renal involvement were widely adopted; histological confirmation was reported in fewer than 25% of cases. Treatment strategies varied considerably: over half of respondents initiated anti-IL-5 therapy at diagnosis, and the combination of glucocorticoids, rituximab and mepolizumab was the preferred induction regimen in severe disease. CS tapering protocols differed, with most clinicians targeting withdrawal within 12 months. PROMs and disease-specific questionnaires were used inconsistently, despite broad recognition of their value. Advocacy groups were viewed as crucial, particularly for patient education and referral.

CONCLUSION

This first multinational survey reveals substantial heterogeneity in real-world diagnostic and therapeutic practice, reflecting gaps in validated criteria, standardized activity measures and treatment algorithms. These findings highlight the need for coordinated prospective research and harmonized evidence-based guidance to optimize outcomes for patients with EGPA.