Patient education and counseling · 2026
"Doing the program, our weight went down, our A1Cs went down": Benefits of a family diabetes self-management program for persons with diabetes and their support persons.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Moore Ramey, McElfish Pearl A, Teeter Benjamin S, Mayberry Lindsay S, Andersen Jennifer A, Hudson Jonell S, Mayo Russell E, Macechko Michael D, Over Darrell R, Curran Geoffrey M, FDSMES Study Group
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Diabetes is a serious, prevalent chronic disease affecting more than 14.7% of US adults, and most of these have type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). A family diabetes self-management education and support (FDSMES) approach has been shown to benefit persons with diabetes (PWDs); however, gaps remain in the literature concerning the effects of FDSMES on communal coping, interpersonal relationships, and potential beneficial health effects for support persons (SPs).
METHODS: To address gaps in the literature, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 dyads, consisting of a PWD and their self-identified support person (SP), assigned to the FDSMES arm and one PWD interviewed individually (n = 25).
RESULTS: Our qualitative analysis identified emergent themes including: increased understanding and empathy among SPs, perceived improvements in quality and self-efficacy of SPs' supportive behaviors, improved PWD-SP relationships, and health benefits for both the PWD and SP.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, greater attention needs to be paid to the benefits of FDSMES for SP in addition to the traditional PWD-focused outcomes, as health behaviors are often shared by SP.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future research and evaluation of FDSMES programs should include measures of the benefits of FDSMES interventions for SPs.
METHODS: To address gaps in the literature, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 12 dyads, consisting of a PWD and their self-identified support person (SP), assigned to the FDSMES arm and one PWD interviewed individually (n = 25).
RESULTS: Our qualitative analysis identified emergent themes including: increased understanding and empathy among SPs, perceived improvements in quality and self-efficacy of SPs' supportive behaviors, improved PWD-SP relationships, and health benefits for both the PWD and SP.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on our findings, greater attention needs to be paid to the benefits of FDSMES for SP in addition to the traditional PWD-focused outcomes, as health behaviors are often shared by SP.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Future research and evaluation of FDSMES programs should include measures of the benefits of FDSMES interventions for SPs.