European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology · 2015
Timing of neck dissection in patients undergoing transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer.
Сравнительное исследованиеКонтролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Möckelmann N, Busch C-J, Münscher A, Knecht R, Lörincz B B
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Oncologic transoral robotic surgery (TORS) requires in most cases the concurrent or staged surgical treatment of the regional lymph nodes in the neck as well. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the timing of the regional lymphadenectomy (neck dissection) has an impact on the surgical outcomes and on the complication rates.
METHODS: Single-institution, prospective case series with internal control group. Twenty-one patients underwent TORS and appropriate neck dissection concurrently (control group), while 20 patients underwent neck dissection in a timely staged fashion, 8.4 days (median; range, 3-28 days) following their TORS procedure (experimental group). Outcome measures included nodal yield, intraoperative pharyngocervical fistula formation, postoperative fistula formation, postoperative bleeding from the primary and from the neck dissection site, haematoma, seroma, and infection.
RESULTS: Nodal yield values, as the oncologic quality indicator of a neck dissection, were comparable in the experimental and in the control group. Complication rates did not differ between the groups: intraoperative and postoperative fistula formation, postoperative bleeding, haematoma and seroma rates were similarly low in the two groups. There was no infection in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present cohort of 41 TORS-patients, the timing of neck dissection did not make a significant difference in the outcomes. We suggest therefore that aspiring and established TORS-teams do not restrict their appropriate indications due to robotic slot and theatre time constraints, but perform each indicated TORS-case as soon as possible within their given systems, even if the neck dissections cannot be done on the same day.
METHODS: Single-institution, prospective case series with internal control group. Twenty-one patients underwent TORS and appropriate neck dissection concurrently (control group), while 20 patients underwent neck dissection in a timely staged fashion, 8.4 days (median; range, 3-28 days) following their TORS procedure (experimental group). Outcome measures included nodal yield, intraoperative pharyngocervical fistula formation, postoperative fistula formation, postoperative bleeding from the primary and from the neck dissection site, haematoma, seroma, and infection.
RESULTS: Nodal yield values, as the oncologic quality indicator of a neck dissection, were comparable in the experimental and in the control group. Complication rates did not differ between the groups: intraoperative and postoperative fistula formation, postoperative bleeding, haematoma and seroma rates were similarly low in the two groups. There was no infection in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: In the present cohort of 41 TORS-patients, the timing of neck dissection did not make a significant difference in the outcomes. We suggest therefore that aspiring and established TORS-teams do not restrict their appropriate indications due to robotic slot and theatre time constraints, but perform each indicated TORS-case as soon as possible within their given systems, even if the neck dissections cannot be done on the same day.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Squamous CellCutaneous FistulaFemaleFistulaHead and Neck NeoplasmsHematomaHumansIntraoperative ComplicationsLength of StayLymphatic MetastasisMaleMiddle AgedMouthNeckNeck DissectionPharyngeal DiseasesPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative HemorrhageProspective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSeromaTime Factors