Acta cardiologica · 2011
Conventional versus complete chordal-sparing mitral valve replacement: effects on left ventricular function and end-systolic stress.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ucak Alper, Ugur Murat, Onan Burak, Arslan Gökhan, Alp Ibrahim, Ulusoy Eralp, Yilmaz Ahmet Turan
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: This study aims to assess the effects of bileaflet preservation versus conventional technique during mitral valve replacement (MVR) on left ventricular functions and end-systolic stress (ESS).
METHODS: Between September 2005 and January 2009, sixty-five patients with mitral regurgitation underwent MVR surgery. In a non-randomized fashion, 34 patients had conventional MVR without chordal/leaflet preservation (group I, c-MVR), and 31 had MVR with total chordal/bileaflet preservation (group II, b-MVR). A prospective clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of patients was performed preoperatively, at 3 months and by 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Left ventricular end-systolic/end-diastolic dimensions and volumes decreased by 1 year in the b-MVR group. Left ventricular ESS decreased only in the bileaflet sparing MVR group after surgery, and this decrease was significant by 1 year, compared with the c-MVR group (P = 0.008). Left atrial diameter significantly decreased in both groups. Only one patient died, due to posterior wall rupture after a c-MVR procedure. One patient undergoing a b-MVR procedure needed re-operation because of prosthetic valve endocarditis.
CONCLUSION: Bileaflet preservation during MVR has a beneficial effect on left ventricular function, compared with conventional MVR. Left ventricular ESS improves after bileaflet-sparing MVR and may be an important indicator of myocardial function after mitral valve surgery.
METHODS: Between September 2005 and January 2009, sixty-five patients with mitral regurgitation underwent MVR surgery. In a non-randomized fashion, 34 patients had conventional MVR without chordal/leaflet preservation (group I, c-MVR), and 31 had MVR with total chordal/bileaflet preservation (group II, b-MVR). A prospective clinical and echocardiographic follow-up of patients was performed preoperatively, at 3 months and by 1 year postoperatively.
RESULTS: Left ventricular end-systolic/end-diastolic dimensions and volumes decreased by 1 year in the b-MVR group. Left ventricular ESS decreased only in the bileaflet sparing MVR group after surgery, and this decrease was significant by 1 year, compared with the c-MVR group (P = 0.008). Left atrial diameter significantly decreased in both groups. Only one patient died, due to posterior wall rupture after a c-MVR procedure. One patient undergoing a b-MVR procedure needed re-operation because of prosthetic valve endocarditis.
CONCLUSION: Bileaflet preservation during MVR has a beneficial effect on left ventricular function, compared with conventional MVR. Left ventricular ESS improves after bileaflet-sparing MVR and may be an important indicator of myocardial function after mitral valve surgery.