Dysphagia · 2014
Afferent nerve ending density in the human laryngeal mucosa: potential implications on endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal sensitivity.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ruoppolo Giovanni, Schettino Ilenia, Biasiotta Antonella, Roma Rocco, Greco Antonio, Soldo Pietro, Marcotullio Dario, Patella Alessandro, Onesti Emanuela, Ceccanti Marco, Albino Francesca, Giordano Carla, Truini Andrea, De Vincentiis Marco, Inghilleri Maurizio
Аннотация
Laryngeal sensitivity is crucial for maintaining safe swallowing, thus avoiding silent aspiration. The sensitivity test, carried out by fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing, plays an important role in the assessment of dysphagic patients. The ventricular folds appear to be more sensitive than the epiglottis during the sensitivity test. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mechanical sensitivity of the supraglottic larynx. In seven healthy adults undergoing microlaryngoscopy to remove vocal cord polyps, we excised mucosal samples from the epiglottis and ventricular folds. We measured afferent nerve fiber density by immunoelectron microscopy. All of the subjects underwent an endoscopic sensitivity test based on lightly touching the laryngeal surface of the epiglottis and ventricular folds. The discomfort level was self-rated by the subjects on the visual analog scale. Samples were fixed and stored in cryoprotectant solution at 4 °C. Sections were stained with the protein gene product 9.5, a pan-neuronal selective marker. Nerve fiber density was calculated as the number of fibers per millimeter length of section. The mean nerve fiber density was higher in ventricular samples than in epiglottis samples (2.96 ± 2.05 vs 0.83 ± 0.51; two-sided p = 0.018). The mean visual analog scale scores were significantly higher for touching the ventricular folds than for touching the epiglottis (8.28 ± 1.11 vs 4.14 ± 1.21; two-sided p = 0.017). The higher sensitivity of the ventricular region should be considered for further refining clinical endoscopic evaluation of laryngeal sensitivity.