Stroke · 2021
Cerebellar Superficial Siderosis in Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Koemans Emma A, Voigt Sabine, Rasing Ingeborg, van Harten Thijs W, Jolink Wilmar M T, Schreuder Floris H B M, van Zwet Erik W, van Buchem Mark A, van Osch Matthias J P, Terwindt Gisela M, Klijn Catharina J M, van Walderveen Marianne A A, Wermer Marieke J H
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Although evidence accumulates that the cerebellum is involved in cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA), cerebellar superficial siderosis is not considered to be a disease marker. The objective of this study is to investigate cerebellar superficial siderosis frequency and its relation to hemorrhagic magnetic resonance imaging markers in patients with sporadic and Dutch-type hereditary CAA and patients with deep perforating arteriopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage.
METHODS: We recruited patients from 3 prospective 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging studies and scored siderosis and hemorrhages. Cerebellar siderosis was identified as hypointense linear signal loss (black) on susceptibility-weighted or T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging which follows at least one folia of the cerebellar cortex (including the vermis).
RESULTS: We included 50 subjects with Dutch-type hereditary CAA, (mean age 50 years), 45 with sporadic CAA (mean age 72 years), and 43 patients with deep perforating arteriopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage (mean age 54 years). Cerebellar superficial siderosis was present in 5 out of 50 (10% [95% CI, 2-18]) patients with Dutch-type hereditary CAA, 4/45 (9% [95% CI, 1-17]) patients with sporadic CAA, and 0 out of 43 (0% [95% CI, 0-8]) patients with deep perforating arteriopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients with cerebellar superficial siderosis had more supratentorial lobar (median number 9 versus 2, relative risk, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.5-3.4]) and superficial cerebellar macrobleeds (median number 2 versus 0, relative risk, 20.3 [95% CI, 8.6-47.6]) compared with patients without the marker. The frequency of cortical superficial siderosis and superficial cerebellar microbleeds was comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that cerebellar superficial siderosis might be a novel marker for CAA.
METHODS: We recruited patients from 3 prospective 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging studies and scored siderosis and hemorrhages. Cerebellar siderosis was identified as hypointense linear signal loss (black) on susceptibility-weighted or T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging which follows at least one folia of the cerebellar cortex (including the vermis).
RESULTS: We included 50 subjects with Dutch-type hereditary CAA, (mean age 50 years), 45 with sporadic CAA (mean age 72 years), and 43 patients with deep perforating arteriopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage (mean age 54 years). Cerebellar superficial siderosis was present in 5 out of 50 (10% [95% CI, 2-18]) patients with Dutch-type hereditary CAA, 4/45 (9% [95% CI, 1-17]) patients with sporadic CAA, and 0 out of 43 (0% [95% CI, 0-8]) patients with deep perforating arteriopathy-related intracerebral hemorrhage. Patients with cerebellar superficial siderosis had more supratentorial lobar (median number 9 versus 2, relative risk, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.5-3.4]) and superficial cerebellar macrobleeds (median number 2 versus 0, relative risk, 20.3 [95% CI, 8.6-47.6]) compared with patients without the marker. The frequency of cortical superficial siderosis and superficial cerebellar microbleeds was comparable.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that cerebellar superficial siderosis might be a novel marker for CAA.