Endocrine practice : official journal of the American College of Endocrinology and the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists · 2025
Estimated Glucose Disposal Rate Predicts the Risk of Incident Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ichikawa Takahiro, Hashimoto Yoshitaka, Okamura Takuro, Obora Akihiro, Kojima Takao, Okada Hiroshi, Hamaguchi Masahide, Fukui Michiaki
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: There is a relationship between insulin resistance and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and the estimated glucose disposal rate (eGDR), which has been reported as a surrogate marker of insulin resistance. This study aimed to investigate the association between eGDR and the incident MASLD, and compare the ability to predict incident MASLD with other insulin resistance markers.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort data from a health check-up program were analyzed. Participants were categorized into 4 subgroups according to eGDR quartiles. To assess the association between eGDR quartiles and incident MASLD, logistic regression analyses were used. Additionally, to compare the predictive ability of eGDR, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (TG/HDL) ratio, and triglyceride glucose index with respect to incident MASLD, receiver operating characteristics analysis was used.
RESULTS: Of 16 689 participants were included, 3654 developed MASLD. After multivariate adjustment, compared with the lowest eGDR quartile, odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for incident MASLD in the second, third, and highest GDR quartiles, were 0.775 (0.692-0.868), 0.478 (0.408-0.560), and 0.147 (0.110-0194), respectively. The association between lower eGDR levels and MASLD risk remained consistent across stratification by sex and obesity status. Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (95% CI) for eGDR (0.8 [0.79-0.81]) was higher than for TG/HDL ratio 0.76 [0.79-0.81]) and triglyceride glucose index (0.75 [0.74-0.76]).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower eGDR levels were associated with an increased risk of incident MASLD. Our findings suggest that eGDR may be a more effective tool for predicting MASLD risk.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort data from a health check-up program were analyzed. Participants were categorized into 4 subgroups according to eGDR quartiles. To assess the association between eGDR quartiles and incident MASLD, logistic regression analyses were used. Additionally, to compare the predictive ability of eGDR, triglyceride/high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (TG/HDL) ratio, and triglyceride glucose index with respect to incident MASLD, receiver operating characteristics analysis was used.
RESULTS: Of 16 689 participants were included, 3654 developed MASLD. After multivariate adjustment, compared with the lowest eGDR quartile, odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for incident MASLD in the second, third, and highest GDR quartiles, were 0.775 (0.692-0.868), 0.478 (0.408-0.560), and 0.147 (0.110-0194), respectively. The association between lower eGDR levels and MASLD risk remained consistent across stratification by sex and obesity status. Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (95% CI) for eGDR (0.8 [0.79-0.81]) was higher than for TG/HDL ratio 0.76 [0.79-0.81]) and triglyceride glucose index (0.75 [0.74-0.76]).
CONCLUSIONS: Lower eGDR levels were associated with an increased risk of incident MASLD. Our findings suggest that eGDR may be a more effective tool for predicting MASLD risk.