Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026
Severe Aortic Stenosis Is Associated With Left Atrial Prothrombotic Flow That Persists Despite Valve Replacement.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Spartera Marco, Stracquadanio Antonio, Bognoni Ludovica, Tang Pok-Tin, Casadei Barbara, Wijesurendra Rohan S, Ferreira Vanessa M, Rider Oliver, Neubauer Stefan, Rigolli Marzia, Myerson Saul
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) is associated with ischemic stroke independently of atrial fibrillation or other causes. Even after aortic valve replacement (AVR), patients remain affected by a 6% 5-year stroke rate with knowledge gaps in the underlying pathophysiology. We hypothesize that severe AS is associated with prothrombotic left atrial (LA) flow changes that do not normalize after AVR.
METHODS: Seventy-seven participants without atrial fibrillation were recruited: 40 with severe AS (median age, 73 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3) and 37 controls with similar risk profile (median age, 71 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3). All underwent baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Among the 40 patients with AS, 23 (58%) underwent AVR and repeat cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ≈6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with severe AS displayed significantly higher left ventricular (LV) mass (P=0.04), smaller LV volumes (P=0.01), and reduced global longitudinal strain (P<0.001). Although LA volume was within the normal range and LA emptying fraction was not different from controls, severe AS was associated with lower LA peak flow velocity (mean, 0.25 versus 0.28 m/s, respectively; P=0.02) and lower LA flow vorticity (mean, 16.6 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls. AVR led to regression of LV hypertrophy with LV mass that was no longer different from controls (P=0.32). Nevertheless, post-AVR patients displayed a persistent adverse morpho-functional phenotype characterized by persistently lower velocity (mean, 0.24 versus 0.28 m/s; P=0.003) and vorticity (17.1 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS display adverse prothrombotic LA flow characteristics that persist after successful AVR despite general regression of LV hypertrophy.
METHODS: Seventy-seven participants without atrial fibrillation were recruited: 40 with severe AS (median age, 73 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3) and 37 controls with similar risk profile (median age, 71 years; CHA2DS2VASc score, 3). All underwent baseline cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Among the 40 patients with AS, 23 (58%) underwent AVR and repeat cardiac magnetic resonance imaging ≈6 months after surgery.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients with severe AS displayed significantly higher left ventricular (LV) mass (P=0.04), smaller LV volumes (P=0.01), and reduced global longitudinal strain (P<0.001). Although LA volume was within the normal range and LA emptying fraction was not different from controls, severe AS was associated with lower LA peak flow velocity (mean, 0.25 versus 0.28 m/s, respectively; P=0.02) and lower LA flow vorticity (mean, 16.6 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls. AVR led to regression of LV hypertrophy with LV mass that was no longer different from controls (P=0.32). Nevertheless, post-AVR patients displayed a persistent adverse morpho-functional phenotype characterized by persistently lower velocity (mean, 0.24 versus 0.28 m/s; P=0.003) and vorticity (17.1 versus 21.1 radians; P<0.001) compared with controls.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with severe AS display adverse prothrombotic LA flow characteristics that persist after successful AVR despite general regression of LV hypertrophy.