Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2026
Prognostic impact of guideline-directed medical therapy after functionally complete revascularisation in patients with obstructive coronary artery diseases.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Geng Yingyang, Guan Changdong, Jiang Yao, Yang WeiXian, Yu Bo, Fu Guosheng, Pu Jun, Qu Xinkai, Zhang Qi, Zhao Yanyan, Yu Lilei, Huang Yunfei, Tu Shengxian, Qiao Shubin, Song Lei
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: Functional complete revascularisation (FCR) has been proven to be associated with superior prognosis following percutaneous coronary intervention. Whether guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) still impacts clinical outcomes in patients who have achieved FCR requires further evaluation.
METHODS: The study population was drawn from patients who achieved FCR in the FAVOR III China trial, defined as a quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-based residual functional Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac Surgery score of 0, measured only in vessels with QFR≤0.80. GDMT was defined as the combination of single or dual antiplatelet therapy, a beta-blocker and a statin, with or without an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, according to contemporary guideline recommendations. Patients were categorised into the GDMT group (compliance with all 4 agents) or non-GDMT group (compliance with 0-3 agents). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 3 years, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and ischaemia-driven revascularisation.
RESULTS: Among 3221 (85.2%) patients who achieved FCR, a total of 1964 (61.2%), 1919 (59.9%), 1545 (48.4%), 1483 (46.6%) and 1084 (35.3%) patients adhered to GDMT at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. The MACCE occurred in 313 (10.2%) patients through 3 years. The rate of MACCE was similar between GDMT and non-GDMT groups within the first year, but significantly lower in the GDMT group from the second year (adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.85; p<0.01) and sustained until the third year (adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.85; p<0.01), compared with the non-GDMT group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who achieved FCR, the benefit of good adherence to GDMT remained significant, starting from the second year and continuing up to 3 years.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03656848.
METHODS: The study population was drawn from patients who achieved FCR in the FAVOR III China trial, defined as a quantitative flow ratio (QFR)-based residual functional Synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac Surgery score of 0, measured only in vessels with QFR≤0.80. GDMT was defined as the combination of single or dual antiplatelet therapy, a beta-blocker and a statin, with or without an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, according to contemporary guideline recommendations. Patients were categorised into the GDMT group (compliance with all 4 agents) or non-GDMT group (compliance with 0-3 agents). The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) at 3 years, a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke and ischaemia-driven revascularisation.
RESULTS: Among 3221 (85.2%) patients who achieved FCR, a total of 1964 (61.2%), 1919 (59.9%), 1545 (48.4%), 1483 (46.6%) and 1084 (35.3%) patients adhered to GDMT at 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years, respectively. The MACCE occurred in 313 (10.2%) patients through 3 years. The rate of MACCE was similar between GDMT and non-GDMT groups within the first year, but significantly lower in the GDMT group from the second year (adjusted HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.51 to 0.85; p<0.01) and sustained until the third year (adjusted HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.50 to 0.85; p<0.01), compared with the non-GDMT group.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients who achieved FCR, the benefit of good adherence to GDMT remained significant, starting from the second year and continuing up to 3 years.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03656848.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansMaleFemaleCoronary Artery DiseaseMiddle AgedAgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPrognosisPractice Guidelines as TopicGuideline AdherenceTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsChinaAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors