Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021
Predicting the risk of postinflammatory hyperpigmentation: The palmar creases pigmentation scale.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Leal-Silva Hector
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) may affect any skin type but has been linked more often to darker skin. While propensity to hyperpigmentation has not been fully elucidated, there may be a direct correlation to one's palmar crease pigmentation.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to validate the reliable use of a palmar creases pigmentation (PCP) scale, and its accuracy in predicting the risk of PIH.
METHODS: A prospective, comparative, and blinded study was conducted through photo-numeric analysis of 126 photographs of pairs of palms. We utilized a 4-point visual scale based on the level of contrast between palmar crease pigment and that of the surrounding skin. Score 0 indicated no difference, score 1 referred to a low difference, score 2 meant a moderate difference, and score 3 related to a high difference. Scores were subdivided based on the risk of PIH. Scores 0-1 are low risk and scores 2-3 are high risk. A panel of 8 medical experts independently evaluated and re-evaluated the photographs that were shown in a random order.
RESULTS: A significant degree of inter-rater reliability was found at both evaluation visits, with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.908, P <.001, at the first evaluation and an ICC = 0.924, P <.001, at the second evaluation, demonstrating a validity of the scale. Global Fleiss kappa for intra-rater reliability for all physicians was 0.514.
CONCLUSION: The PCP scale can be effectively used by any physician to predict hyperpigmentation risk.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to validate the reliable use of a palmar creases pigmentation (PCP) scale, and its accuracy in predicting the risk of PIH.
METHODS: A prospective, comparative, and blinded study was conducted through photo-numeric analysis of 126 photographs of pairs of palms. We utilized a 4-point visual scale based on the level of contrast between palmar crease pigment and that of the surrounding skin. Score 0 indicated no difference, score 1 referred to a low difference, score 2 meant a moderate difference, and score 3 related to a high difference. Scores were subdivided based on the risk of PIH. Scores 0-1 are low risk and scores 2-3 are high risk. A panel of 8 medical experts independently evaluated and re-evaluated the photographs that were shown in a random order.
RESULTS: A significant degree of inter-rater reliability was found at both evaluation visits, with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.908, P <.001, at the first evaluation and an ICC = 0.924, P <.001, at the second evaluation, demonstrating a validity of the scale. Global Fleiss kappa for intra-rater reliability for all physicians was 0.514.
CONCLUSION: The PCP scale can be effectively used by any physician to predict hyperpigmentation risk.