MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/14737167.2018.1503952

Медицинская библиотека · Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research · 2018

Economic evaluation of typhoid - a review.

Frempong Samuel N, Sutton Andrew J, Davenport Clare, Barton Pelham

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the potential economic value and likely impact of a hypothetical rapid test in its early stages of development requires the use of models. The model structure and the type of model (dynamic/static) to employ are key considerations. The aim of the review was to explore the literature on typhoid economic evaluations and to explore the types of models that have been previously adopted in this setting for test-treat evaluations and to capture data on model inputs that may be useful for a de novo model.

AREAS COVERED: A systematic review was conducted to identify economic evaluations focused on typhoid in established literature databases. Eight studies were identified and included for narrative synthesis. The review has revealed that there have been relatively few economic evaluations that have focused on typhoid fever, all of which have focused on the impact of interventions at the population level (vaccination) but not the individual level (test-treat strategies).

EXPERT COMMENTARY: Under certain circumstances, either a static model or a transmission dynamic model may be appropriate in the evaluation of an intervention for typhoid fever. Typhoid test-treat modeling represents a gray area where further work is needed.

Для цитирования: Frempong Samuel N, Sutton Andrew J, Davenport Clare, Barton Pelham. Economic evaluation of typhoid - a review.. Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research. 2018. DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1503952.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.