Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2011
The impact of retardance pattern variability on nerve fiber layer measurements over time using GDx with variable and enhanced corneal compensation.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Grewal Dilraj S, Sehi Mitra, Cook Richard J, Greenfield David S, Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To examine the impact of retardance pattern variability on retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) measurements over time using scanning laser polarimetry with variable (GDxVCC) and enhanced corneal compensation (GDxECC; both by Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA).
METHODS: Glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes with 4 years of follow-up participating in the Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study were prospectively enrolled. All eyes underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), GDxVCC, and GDxECC imaging every 6 months. SAP progression was determined with point-wise linear regression analysis of SAP sensitivity values. Typical scan score (TSS) values were extracted as a measure of retardance image quality; an atypical retardation pattern (ARP) was defined as TSS < 80. TSS fluctuation over time was measured using three parameters: change in TSS from baseline, absolute difference (maximum minus minimum TSS value), and TSS variance. Linear mixed-effects models that accommodated the association between the two eyes were constructed to evaluate the relationship between change in TSS and RNFL thickness over time.
RESULTS: Eighty-six eyes (51 suspected glaucoma, 35 glaucomatous) of 45 patients were enrolled. Twenty (23.3%) eyes demonstrated SAP progression. There was significantly greater fluctuation in TSS over time with GDxVCC compared with GDxECC as measured by absolute difference (18.40 ± 15.35 units vs. 2.50 ± 4.69 units; P < 0.001), TSS variance (59.63 ± 87.27 units vs. 3.82 ± 9.63 units, P < 0.001), and change in TSS from baseline (-0.83 ± 11.2 vs. 0.25 ± 2.9, P = 0.01). The change in TSS over time significantly (P = 0.006) influenced the TSNIT average RNFL thickness when measured by GDxVCC but not by GDxECC.
CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal images obtained with GDxECC have significantly less variability in TSS and retardance patterns and have reduced bias produced by ARP on RNFL progression assessment.
METHODS: Glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes with 4 years of follow-up participating in the Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study were prospectively enrolled. All eyes underwent standard automated perimetry (SAP), GDxVCC, and GDxECC imaging every 6 months. SAP progression was determined with point-wise linear regression analysis of SAP sensitivity values. Typical scan score (TSS) values were extracted as a measure of retardance image quality; an atypical retardation pattern (ARP) was defined as TSS < 80. TSS fluctuation over time was measured using three parameters: change in TSS from baseline, absolute difference (maximum minus minimum TSS value), and TSS variance. Linear mixed-effects models that accommodated the association between the two eyes were constructed to evaluate the relationship between change in TSS and RNFL thickness over time.
RESULTS: Eighty-six eyes (51 suspected glaucoma, 35 glaucomatous) of 45 patients were enrolled. Twenty (23.3%) eyes demonstrated SAP progression. There was significantly greater fluctuation in TSS over time with GDxVCC compared with GDxECC as measured by absolute difference (18.40 ± 15.35 units vs. 2.50 ± 4.69 units; P < 0.001), TSS variance (59.63 ± 87.27 units vs. 3.82 ± 9.63 units, P < 0.001), and change in TSS from baseline (-0.83 ± 11.2 vs. 0.25 ± 2.9, P = 0.01). The change in TSS over time significantly (P = 0.006) influenced the TSNIT average RNFL thickness when measured by GDxVCC but not by GDxECC.
CONCLUSIONS: Longitudinal images obtained with GDxECC have significantly less variability in TSS and retardance patterns and have reduced bias produced by ARP on RNFL progression assessment.