American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics · 2026
Deep learning-assisted cone-beam computed tomography volumetric assessment of mandibular anterior alveolar bone changes with and without periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics during skeletal Class III orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Pan Mengqiao, Guo Runzhi, Yang Huifang, Liu Jian, Xu Li, Hou Jianxia
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion often have thin anterior alveolar bone and an increased periodontal risk. This study evaluated 3-dimensional (3D) alveolar bone volume changes in patients treated with or without periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics (PAOO) using a deep learning-assisted cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) approach.
METHODS: A total of 42 adults undergoing orthodontic-orthognathic treatment were divided into a PAOO group (group S, n = 21) and a matched non-PAOO control group (group NS, n = 21). CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1) and posttreatment (T3), with a 6-month post-PAOO scan (T2) for group S. Labial, lingual, and total alveolar bone volumes were quantified using a deep learning-assisted automated segmentation tool. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze longitudinal changes and treatment effects, adjusting for baseline root length.
RESULTS: In group S, labial alveolar bone volume increased from T1 (42.94 ± 23.15 mm3) to T3 (84.15 ± 36.82 mm3; P <0.001), contributing to an increase in total alveolar bone volume (139.92 ± 86.42 mm3 at T3 vs 114.20 ± 66.86 mm3 at T1; P <0.001). Group NS showed no change in labial bone volume (P = 0.846) but a reduction in total bone volume at T3 (93.76 ± 67.24 mm3; P <0.001), primarily driven by lingual loss. Group S had greater labial and total alveolar bone volumes than group NS at T3 (P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PAOO was associated with increased and maintained labial alveolar bone volume, which may help preserve total alveolar support during combined treatment. Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation can serve as an efficient volumetric evaluation tool.
METHODS: A total of 42 adults undergoing orthodontic-orthognathic treatment were divided into a PAOO group (group S, n = 21) and a matched non-PAOO control group (group NS, n = 21). CBCT scans were obtained at baseline (T1) and posttreatment (T3), with a 6-month post-PAOO scan (T2) for group S. Labial, lingual, and total alveolar bone volumes were quantified using a deep learning-assisted automated segmentation tool. Linear mixed-effects models were used to analyze longitudinal changes and treatment effects, adjusting for baseline root length.
RESULTS: In group S, labial alveolar bone volume increased from T1 (42.94 ± 23.15 mm3) to T3 (84.15 ± 36.82 mm3; P <0.001), contributing to an increase in total alveolar bone volume (139.92 ± 86.42 mm3 at T3 vs 114.20 ± 66.86 mm3 at T1; P <0.001). Group NS showed no change in labial bone volume (P = 0.846) but a reduction in total bone volume at T3 (93.76 ± 67.24 mm3; P <0.001), primarily driven by lingual loss. Group S had greater labial and total alveolar bone volumes than group NS at T3 (P <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: PAOO was associated with increased and maintained labial alveolar bone volume, which may help preserve total alveolar support during combined treatment. Deep learning-assisted CBCT segmentation can serve as an efficient volumetric evaluation tool.