Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995) · 1997
Traumatic aphakia treated with an iris prosthesis/intraocular lens or epikeratophakia.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Uusitalo R J, Uusitalo H M
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively analyzed the visual results and postoperative complications associated with severely traumatized eyes in which aphakia was corrected with epikeratophakia or a sutured iris prosthesis/intraocular lens (IOL).
METHODS: Fourteen eyes (14 patients) with traumatic aphakia and severe anterior segment complications were corrected either with epikeratophakia or a sutured iris prosthesis/IOL. All eyes lacked lens capsule or iris support for an IOL. The surgical technique of implanting an iris prosthesis/IOL employed transcleral suturing in the ciliary sulcus combined with penetrating keratoplasty.
RESULTS: In the eight eyes treated with epikeratophakia, four (50%) had spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Almost all of these eyes lost one or two Snellen lines of baseline spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Few complications occurred after epikeratophakia; none were severe. Of six eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and a sutured iris prosthesis/IOL or a sutured posterior chamber IOL, two (33%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In the IOL group, severe complications occurred, including posterior dislocation of the lens and secondary glaucoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical correction of aphakia in severely traumatized eyes requires specialized surgical techniques. Epikeratophakia is a low-risk operation that can be performed in eyes in which an IOL is contraindicated. The iris prosthesis/IOL technique results in good cosmetic results; however, due to complications, this technique should be used with caution.
METHODS: Fourteen eyes (14 patients) with traumatic aphakia and severe anterior segment complications were corrected either with epikeratophakia or a sutured iris prosthesis/IOL. All eyes lacked lens capsule or iris support for an IOL. The surgical technique of implanting an iris prosthesis/IOL employed transcleral suturing in the ciliary sulcus combined with penetrating keratoplasty.
RESULTS: In the eight eyes treated with epikeratophakia, four (50%) had spectacle-corrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better. Almost all of these eyes lost one or two Snellen lines of baseline spectacle-corrected visual acuity. Few complications occurred after epikeratophakia; none were severe. Of six eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and a sutured iris prosthesis/IOL or a sutured posterior chamber IOL, two (33%) achieved a visual acuity of 20/40 or better. In the IOL group, severe complications occurred, including posterior dislocation of the lens and secondary glaucoma.
CONCLUSIONS: The surgical correction of aphakia in severely traumatized eyes requires specialized surgical techniques. Epikeratophakia is a low-risk operation that can be performed in eyes in which an IOL is contraindicated. The iris prosthesis/IOL technique results in good cosmetic results; however, due to complications, this technique should be used with caution.