Arthritis care & research · 2023
Incidence of Pneumocystis Jiroveci Pneumonia in Patients With ANCA-Associated Vasculitis Initiating Therapy With Rituximab or Cyclophosphamide.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nettleton Elizabeth, Sattui Sebastian E, Wallace Zachary, Putman Michael
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: This manuscript assesses the incidence of Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) among patients receiving contemporary treatment regimens for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) and adverse events associated with PJP prophylaxis.
METHODS: Incident users of rituximab or cyclophosphamide for AAV were identified in the TriNetX electronic health records database from 2011 to 2022. The incidence rates (IRs) of PJP in the first 6 months of induction therapy with rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide and during postinduction maintenance therapy with rituximab were calculated. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of adverse events commonly associated with PJP prophylaxis.
RESULTS: We identified 1,461 AAV cases who received induction therapy with rituximab (69.7%), cyclophosphamide (18.9%), or both (11.4%). Prophylaxis prescribed within 30 days of induction included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (30.7%), atovaquone (5.4%), dapsone (3.8%), and pentamidine (0.8%). During induction therapy, 10 cases of PJP were identified (IR 15.0 cases per 1,000 patient-years); no deaths occurred. In adjusted analyses, those who received prophylaxis had a higher risk of leukopenia (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-8.6), rash (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.6), and nephropathy (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.1) than those who did not. During rituximab maintenance therapy (n = 709), five cases of PJP were identified (IR 2.1 cases per 1,000 person-years), one of whom died during the hospitalization associated with a PJP diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Rates of PJP in patients with AAV were lower than previously observed, and few cases occurred during rituximab maintenance therapy. PJP prophylaxis was associated with adverse events.
METHODS: Incident users of rituximab or cyclophosphamide for AAV were identified in the TriNetX electronic health records database from 2011 to 2022. The incidence rates (IRs) of PJP in the first 6 months of induction therapy with rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide and during postinduction maintenance therapy with rituximab were calculated. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) for the risk of adverse events commonly associated with PJP prophylaxis.
RESULTS: We identified 1,461 AAV cases who received induction therapy with rituximab (69.7%), cyclophosphamide (18.9%), or both (11.4%). Prophylaxis prescribed within 30 days of induction included trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (30.7%), atovaquone (5.4%), dapsone (3.8%), and pentamidine (0.8%). During induction therapy, 10 cases of PJP were identified (IR 15.0 cases per 1,000 patient-years); no deaths occurred. In adjusted analyses, those who received prophylaxis had a higher risk of leukopenia (HR 3.1; 95% CI 1.1-8.6), rash (HR 1.9; 95% CI 1.0-3.6), and nephropathy (HR 2.6; 95% CI 1.3-5.1) than those who did not. During rituximab maintenance therapy (n = 709), five cases of PJP were identified (IR 2.1 cases per 1,000 person-years), one of whom died during the hospitalization associated with a PJP diagnosis.
CONCLUSION: Rates of PJP in patients with AAV were lower than previously observed, and few cases occurred during rituximab maintenance therapy. PJP prophylaxis was associated with adverse events.