[Signs and symptoms, etiologies and clinical course of parosmia + in a series of 84 patients].

Eighty-four patients (72% females and 28% males) consulted between January 1995 and January 1998 for olfactory disorders with parosmia (erroneous olfactory response to stimuli). Parosmia occurred immediately after or during the course of acute rhinitis (n=70, 83%), head trauma (n=7, 9%), naso-sinus polyposis (n=5, 6%), chronic rhinitis (n=1) or frontal tumor (n=1). Quantitative and qualitative olfactory disorders were analyzed and products producing the parosmia were identified. The only cases where parosmia regressed concerned patients who developed parosmia after acute rhinitis (n=28 cases, 33%). The prognosis of parosmia appeared to be better when it was a secondary phenomenon: i) the percentage of improvements was higher though not significant (41% versus 26.7% compared with primary parosmia), ii) delay to improvement was shorter (8.4 +/- 2.1 months versus 14.5 +/- 4.4 months for primary parosmia, p<10(-4) ), iii) there were no cases of persistent parosmia where quantitative disorders improved (compared with 7 cases of persistent primary parosmia, p<0.05). In addition, the prognosis of associated quantitative disorders was the same for both primary and secondary parosmia. Only the delay to improvement appeared to be shorter in case of secondary parosomia (though the difference was not significant). Products which produced the parosmic perception were identified by nearly all the patients (85%). The most frequently cited products were coffee, perfume, certain fruits (melon, banana, citric fruits), tobacco or chocolate. All these products contain tannic acid, a water-soluble polyphenol with many biological properties (influence feeding habits and metabolism in the rate, antioxidant and antimutagenic properties). Thus acid tannic could induce parosmic perception due to its antioxidant properties susceptible of integrating the P-450 cytochromes of the mucosal cells or olfactory neuroepithelium supporting cells.