International journal of dermatology · 2024
Treatment of recurrent aphthous stomatitis with oral roflumilast, a multicenter observational study.
СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Peñuelas Leal Rodrigo, Bagan Leticia, Grau Echevarría Andrés, Peñuelas Ruiz Jose Amancio, Zaragoza Ninet Violeta, Sánchez Carazo Jose Luis, Pérez Pastor Gemma, Labrandero Hoyos Carolina, Finello Malena, Martínez Fernández Sandra, Blaya Imbernon Daniel, González García Ángel, Pérez Zafrilla Elena, Martí Cabrera Miguel, Bagan Jose
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Severe recurrent aphthous stomatitis (RAS) represents a therapeutic challenge because of its impact on the patient's quality of life. Additionally, no approved systemic therapies are available. Roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, has shown promise in other inflammatory dermatological conditions. This study aimed to assess the characteristics, effectiveness, and safety of roflumilast in treating RAS in routine clinical practice.
METHODS: This is a single cohort ambispective observational study conducted in five Spanish centers. Twenty-two patients with RAS treated with roflumilast participated. Data collection included demographic, clinical, and outcome variables. Statistical analysis compared the outcomes of 12 weeks of roflumilast treatment with a similar prior period without treatment.
RESULTS: During treatment with roflumilast, a significant reduction in flare-ups (88%) and oral ulcers (94%) was observed compared to the untreated period. A reduction in pain (66%) and ulcer duration (63%) was observed. Adverse effects (AEs) occurred in 13 patients, predominantly headache and gastrointestinal disturbances. Most of these were self-limiting or manageable with dose adjustment. Treatment was withdrawn in three cases, mainly because of AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that roflumilast may effectively treat RAS by reducing the number of flare-ups and ulcers, their duration, and the symptomatology produced by the ulcers. In addition, roflumilast has a good safety profile, is well tolerated at low doses, and does not require close monitoring. These characteristics and its favorable economic profile make roflumilast a promising therapeutic option in this pathology.
METHODS: This is a single cohort ambispective observational study conducted in five Spanish centers. Twenty-two patients with RAS treated with roflumilast participated. Data collection included demographic, clinical, and outcome variables. Statistical analysis compared the outcomes of 12 weeks of roflumilast treatment with a similar prior period without treatment.
RESULTS: During treatment with roflumilast, a significant reduction in flare-ups (88%) and oral ulcers (94%) was observed compared to the untreated period. A reduction in pain (66%) and ulcer duration (63%) was observed. Adverse effects (AEs) occurred in 13 patients, predominantly headache and gastrointestinal disturbances. Most of these were self-limiting or manageable with dose adjustment. Treatment was withdrawn in three cases, mainly because of AEs.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that roflumilast may effectively treat RAS by reducing the number of flare-ups and ulcers, their duration, and the symptomatology produced by the ulcers. In addition, roflumilast has a good safety profile, is well tolerated at low doses, and does not require close monitoring. These characteristics and its favorable economic profile make roflumilast a promising therapeutic option in this pathology.