Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, N.J. : 1995) · 2026
Comparative Evaluation of Growth Factor Bioavailability-Enhanced Allograft Vs Autogenous Bone Graft in Anterior Maxillary Ridge Augmentation.
СтатьяКлинический случайСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Ren
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Alveolar ridge deficiencies following trauma, tooth loss, or endodontic pathology may compromise implant placement in the anterior maxilla. While autogenous bone grafting remains the benchmark, a growth factor bioavailability-enhanced allograft (GFBA) has been developed as an alternative.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old man presented for implant rehabilitation in the anterior maxilla. Tooth No. 8 was missing due to trauma that occurred approximately 20 years prior. Cone-beam computed tomography findings for site No. 8 showed an atrophic alveolar ridge with intact cortical plates and no intraosseous pathology, but insufficient ridge volume. Tooth No. 7 had been previously endodontically treated and exhibited periapical rarefying osteitis, buccal cortical plate dehiscence, and widening of the periodontal ligament space, consistent with a persistent inflammatory process. Treatment involved extraction of tooth No. 7 with socket debridement and grafting using a GFBA and ridge augmentation at site No. 8 using an autogenous ramus block graft.
RESULTS: At 11 months, both sites demonstrated successful ridge augmentation. The GFBA site showed a homogeneous trabecular pattern and advanced integration, while the autogenous graft demonstrated ongoing remodeling and graft integration. Implants were placed successfully at both sites, with follow-up radiographs confirming stable peri-implant bone levels and successful osseointegration.
CONCLUSION: GFBA may serve as an alternative to autogenous bone grafting in moderate ridge defects.
CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old man presented for implant rehabilitation in the anterior maxilla. Tooth No. 8 was missing due to trauma that occurred approximately 20 years prior. Cone-beam computed tomography findings for site No. 8 showed an atrophic alveolar ridge with intact cortical plates and no intraosseous pathology, but insufficient ridge volume. Tooth No. 7 had been previously endodontically treated and exhibited periapical rarefying osteitis, buccal cortical plate dehiscence, and widening of the periodontal ligament space, consistent with a persistent inflammatory process. Treatment involved extraction of tooth No. 7 with socket debridement and grafting using a GFBA and ridge augmentation at site No. 8 using an autogenous ramus block graft.
RESULTS: At 11 months, both sites demonstrated successful ridge augmentation. The GFBA site showed a homogeneous trabecular pattern and advanced integration, while the autogenous graft demonstrated ongoing remodeling and graft integration. Implants were placed successfully at both sites, with follow-up radiographs confirming stable peri-implant bone levels and successful osseointegration.
CONCLUSION: GFBA may serve as an alternative to autogenous bone grafting in moderate ridge defects.