Acta ophthalmologica · 2008
The Groningen Longitudinal Glaucoma Study. II. A prospective comparison of frequency doubling perimetry, the GDx nerve fibre analyser and standard automated perimetry in glaucoma suspect patients.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jansonius Nomdo M, Heeg Govert P
Аннотация
PURPOSE: We aimed to determine prospectively the incidence of abnormal test results on frequency doubling perimetry (FDT), the nerve fibre analyser (GDx) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in a cohort of glaucoma suspect patients with normal findings for all these tests at baseline.
METHODS: Seventy glaucoma suspect patients were followed prospectively for 4 years with SAP (Humphrey field analyser 30-2 SITA Fast), FDT (C-20 full-threshold) and GDx (Version 2.010) in a clinical setting. All patients had normal baseline test results on SAP, FDT and GDx. After the follow-up period, the number of patients who converted (whose test results changed from normal at baseline to reproducibly abnormal during follow-up) were counted for each technique and then compared. The cut-off point for FDT was > 1 depressed test-point p < 0.01 in the total deviation probability plot; the cut-off point for GDx was the Number > 29.
RESULTS: Of the 70 glaucoma suspect patients, three converted on FDT, 14 on GDx and six on SAP. These proportions are significantly different for GDx versus SAP (p = 0.033) and GDx versus FDT (p = 0.002), but not for FDT versus SAP (p = 0.256).
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent finding after a 4-year follow-up was conversion on GDx.
METHODS: Seventy glaucoma suspect patients were followed prospectively for 4 years with SAP (Humphrey field analyser 30-2 SITA Fast), FDT (C-20 full-threshold) and GDx (Version 2.010) in a clinical setting. All patients had normal baseline test results on SAP, FDT and GDx. After the follow-up period, the number of patients who converted (whose test results changed from normal at baseline to reproducibly abnormal during follow-up) were counted for each technique and then compared. The cut-off point for FDT was > 1 depressed test-point p < 0.01 in the total deviation probability plot; the cut-off point for GDx was the Number > 29.
RESULTS: Of the 70 glaucoma suspect patients, three converted on FDT, 14 on GDx and six on SAP. These proportions are significantly different for GDx versus SAP (p = 0.033) and GDx versus FDT (p = 0.002), but not for FDT versus SAP (p = 0.256).
CONCLUSIONS: The most frequent finding after a 4-year follow-up was conversion on GDx.