Health affairs scholar · 2026
Lifting eviction moratoria shifted treatment for substance use disorders.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Eisenberg Matthew D, Ge Yimin, Leifheit Kathryn M, Kennedy-Hendricks Alene, Linton Sabriya, Fingerhood Michael, Qureshi Iraj, Robinson Leah, Roberts Laken, Pollack Craig Evan
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: About 2.7 million U.S. households face an eviction filing each year. The effect of eviction policy on substance use disorder (SUD) treatment is uncertain.
METHODS: We used IQVIA all-payer claims, Jan 2020-Dec 2021, in a difference-in-differences design. Phase 1 compared states where moratoria expired March-August 2020 with states that kept protections. Phase 2 examined the August 2021 end of the federal moratorium, contrasting states with ongoing state moratoria vs none. The population was people with a mental health or SUD diagnosis. Outcomes were state-week counts of unique patients with outpatient SUD visits, inpatient SUD stays, medications for opioid or alcohol use disorder, and opioid use disorder (OUD)-specific outpatient and inpatient care.
RESULTS: Ending moratoria was associated with more patients receiving outpatient SUD care: +3.3% (95% CI -0.5% to 7.2%; P = 0.09) in Phase 1 and +4.9% (95% CI 1.8% to 8.0%; P = 0.002) in Phase 2. We observed no change in inpatient SUD care. In Phase 2, medication treatment increased by 2.5% (95% CI 0.3% to 4.7%; P = 0.03). OUD-specific results were similar.
CONCLUSION: The return of eviction risk coincided with greater use of clinic-based SUD services but not hospital care. Housing policy may shift where and how people seek SUD treatment.
METHODS: We used IQVIA all-payer claims, Jan 2020-Dec 2021, in a difference-in-differences design. Phase 1 compared states where moratoria expired March-August 2020 with states that kept protections. Phase 2 examined the August 2021 end of the federal moratorium, contrasting states with ongoing state moratoria vs none. The population was people with a mental health or SUD diagnosis. Outcomes were state-week counts of unique patients with outpatient SUD visits, inpatient SUD stays, medications for opioid or alcohol use disorder, and opioid use disorder (OUD)-specific outpatient and inpatient care.
RESULTS: Ending moratoria was associated with more patients receiving outpatient SUD care: +3.3% (95% CI -0.5% to 7.2%; P = 0.09) in Phase 1 and +4.9% (95% CI 1.8% to 8.0%; P = 0.002) in Phase 2. We observed no change in inpatient SUD care. In Phase 2, medication treatment increased by 2.5% (95% CI 0.3% to 4.7%; P = 0.03). OUD-specific results were similar.
CONCLUSION: The return of eviction risk coincided with greater use of clinic-based SUD services but not hospital care. Housing policy may shift where and how people seek SUD treatment.