Eye (London, England) · 2006
Decision-making in second-eye cataract surgery: can presence of Pulfrich phenomenon help?
Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cetinkaya A, Oto S, Akova Y A
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To determine whether testing for the Pulfrich phenomenon (PP) can be used as a tool to assess the need for and optimal timing of second-eye cataract surgery.
METHODS: A total of 61 patients with logMAR 0 visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery in one eye and logMAR 0.2-0.7 VA in the other eye were tested for PP using a computer-generated oscillating target at Baskent University Hospital. Only patients who had no ophthalmologic or systemic problem that could cause PP were included. In all, 15 normal patients with logMAR 0 VA in both eyes served as controls. The main outcome measures were presence and magnitude (measured by neutral density filters) of PP and presence of complaints related to binocular vision.
RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 36 (59%) and none of the controls were PP (+) (P<0.001). A total of 27 (75%) of the PP (+) patients had logMAR 0.7-0.4 VA, and nine (25%) had logMAR 0.3-0.2 VA (P=0.01). In all, 16 patients (all PP (+)) had developed binocular vision-related complaints since cataract surgery. The mean PP magnitude in these cases was significantly greater than the mean for the 20 patients without complaints (1.2+/-0.5 vs0.6+/-0.4 log units, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean VA in the complaint (+) and complaint (-) subgroups (P=0.213).
CONCLUSION: PP testing may detect binocular visual dysfunction after first-eye cataract surgery; thus, it could help assess the need for second-eye cataract surgery on this basis.
METHODS: A total of 61 patients with logMAR 0 visual acuity (VA) after cataract surgery in one eye and logMAR 0.2-0.7 VA in the other eye were tested for PP using a computer-generated oscillating target at Baskent University Hospital. Only patients who had no ophthalmologic or systemic problem that could cause PP were included. In all, 15 normal patients with logMAR 0 VA in both eyes served as controls. The main outcome measures were presence and magnitude (measured by neutral density filters) of PP and presence of complaints related to binocular vision.
RESULTS: Of the 61 patients, 36 (59%) and none of the controls were PP (+) (P<0.001). A total of 27 (75%) of the PP (+) patients had logMAR 0.7-0.4 VA, and nine (25%) had logMAR 0.3-0.2 VA (P=0.01). In all, 16 patients (all PP (+)) had developed binocular vision-related complaints since cataract surgery. The mean PP magnitude in these cases was significantly greater than the mean for the 20 patients without complaints (1.2+/-0.5 vs0.6+/-0.4 log units, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant difference between the mean VA in the complaint (+) and complaint (-) subgroups (P=0.213).
CONCLUSION: PP testing may detect binocular visual dysfunction after first-eye cataract surgery; thus, it could help assess the need for second-eye cataract surgery on this basis.