MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jocn.2026.111884

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2026

Neurophysiological insights into iNPH: ABR and CAEP responses to lumbar puncture and shunt surgery.

Mielle Lucas Pinto, Santos Nayara Pereira, Fagundes Silva Liliane Aparecida, de Andrade Matas Sandro Luíz, Matas Carla Gentile

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) is a neurological syndrome resulting from increased cerebrospinal fluid volume without significant increase in intracranial pressure. The diagnosis is difficult and investigating other tools that can assist in this process is essential. Auditory Evoked Potentials (AEPs) can be used to assess the auditory pathway integrity and monitor cognitive auditory functions. The objective of this study was to investigate the applicability of the AEPs as a potential monitoring tool for detecting clinical improvements associated with cerebrospinal fluid removal by lumbar puncture and VPS placement in patients with iNPH.

METHODS

This longitudinal study, evaluated 17 individuals with iNPH, aged over 60 years who underwent the ventriculoperitoneal shunt, by Auditory Brainstem Response (ABR) and Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials (CAEP) at three different times: before the lumbar puncture during the Tap test, two to four hours after the lumbar puncture, and after the ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

RESULTS

A decrease in P3 latency was observed after lumbar puncture during Tap test. No statistically significant differences were observed between assessments for P1, N1 P2, N2 latencies or P1-N1, P2-N2 and N2-P3 amplitudes of the CAEP, as well as for the absolute and interpeaks latencies of the ABR.

CONCLUSIONS

After the removal of significant volumes of cerebrospinal fluid in patients with iNPH, lower P3 latency values were found, suggesting an increase in the speed of acoustic information processing, during the Tap test. This result brings an insight on the applicability of this procedure as an auxiliary method for monitoring clinical improvements associated with cerebrospinal fluid removal in iNPH.

Для цитирования: Mielle Lucas Pinto, Santos Nayara Pereira, Fagundes Silva Liliane Aparecida, de Andrade Matas Sandro Luíz, Matas Carla Gentile. Neurophysiological insights into iNPH: ABR and CAEP responses to lumbar puncture and shunt surgery.. Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia. 2026. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2026.111884.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.