Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2015
Arterial Spin Labeling Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Image with Dual Postlabeling Delay: A Correlative Study with Acetazolamide Loading (123)I-Iodoamphetamine Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography.
Клинический случайОценочное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Haga Sei, Morioka Takato, Shimogawa Takafumi, Akiyama Tomoaki, Murao Kei, Kanazawa Yuka, Sayama Tetsuro, Arakawa Shuji
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Perfusion magnetic resonance image with arterial spin labeling (ASL) provides a completely noninvasive measurement of cerebral blood flow (CBF). However, arterial transient times can have a marked effect on the ASL signal. For example, a single postlabeling delay (PLD) of 1.5 seconds underestimates the slowly streaming collateral pathways that maintain the cerebrovascular reserve (CVR). To overcome this limitation, we developed a dual PLD method.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A dual PLD method of 1.5 and 2.5 seconds was compared with (123)I-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography with acetazolamide loading to assess CVR in 10 patients with steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease.
RESULTS: In 5 cases (Group A), dual PLD-ASL demonstrated low CBF with 1.5-second PLD in the target area, whereas CBF was improved with 2.5-second PLD. In the other 5 cases (Group B), dual PLD-ASL depicted low CBF with 1.5-second PLD, and no improvement in CBF with 2.5-second PLD in the target area was observed. On single-photon emission computed tomography, CVR was maintained in Group A but decreased in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Although dual PLD methods may not be a completely alternative test for (123)I-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography with acetazolamide loading, it is a feasible, simple, noninvasive, and repeatable technique for assessing CVR, even when employed in a routine clinical setting.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A dual PLD method of 1.5 and 2.5 seconds was compared with (123)I-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography with acetazolamide loading to assess CVR in 10 patients with steno-occlusive cerebrovascular disease.
RESULTS: In 5 cases (Group A), dual PLD-ASL demonstrated low CBF with 1.5-second PLD in the target area, whereas CBF was improved with 2.5-second PLD. In the other 5 cases (Group B), dual PLD-ASL depicted low CBF with 1.5-second PLD, and no improvement in CBF with 2.5-second PLD in the target area was observed. On single-photon emission computed tomography, CVR was maintained in Group A but decreased in Group B.
CONCLUSIONS: Although dual PLD methods may not be a completely alternative test for (123)I-iodoamphetamine single-photon emission computed tomography with acetazolamide loading, it is a feasible, simple, noninvasive, and repeatable technique for assessing CVR, even when employed in a routine clinical setting.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AcetazolamideAgedAged, 80 and overCarotid Artery, InternalCarotid StenosisCerebral ArteriesCerebrovascular CirculationCerebrovascular DisordersCollateral CirculationContrast MediaDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingFemaleHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryIntracranial ArteriosclerosisIofetamineMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingPerfusion ImagingRetrospective StudiesSpin LabelsStrokeTime FactorsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonVasodilator Agents