The International journal of social psychiatry · 2016
A comparison of perceptions of 'modern-type' and melancholic depression in Japan.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sakamoto Shinji, Yamakawa Itsuki, Muranaka Masaki
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: In Japan, psychiatrists have noted two different types of depression, traditional/melancholic depression and 'modern-type' depression (MTD). Although both the modern and the traditional types of depression overlap in regard to symptoms, these are two distinct syndromes, which can lead to confusion for Japanese people.
AIMS: This study aims to examine impressions of two types of depression using vignettes and clarify the differences in perceptions of the two types.
METHODS: The participants, 206 Japanese undergraduates, were presented with two vignettes, one describing a patient with traditional-type depression and the other describing a patient with MTD, and then were asked to answer questions regarding their perceptions of the patient. In order to control covariates (i.e. perceived severity and dysfunction of depression), analyses of covariance with repeated measures were administered.
RESULTS: People generally had more negative perceptions of the patient with MTD. For example, when the protagonist was the patient with MTD, people were more likely to avoid and less motivated to support the patient. Large differences were also found in causal attribution to internal and controllable causes.
CONCLUSION: Negative impressions of the patient with MTD may be partly explained by causal attribution to internal and controllable factors.
AIMS: This study aims to examine impressions of two types of depression using vignettes and clarify the differences in perceptions of the two types.
METHODS: The participants, 206 Japanese undergraduates, were presented with two vignettes, one describing a patient with traditional-type depression and the other describing a patient with MTD, and then were asked to answer questions regarding their perceptions of the patient. In order to control covariates (i.e. perceived severity and dysfunction of depression), analyses of covariance with repeated measures were administered.
RESULTS: People generally had more negative perceptions of the patient with MTD. For example, when the protagonist was the patient with MTD, people were more likely to avoid and less motivated to support the patient. Large differences were also found in causal attribution to internal and controllable causes.
CONCLUSION: Negative impressions of the patient with MTD may be partly explained by causal attribution to internal and controllable factors.