Mosquito Saliva Subunit Vaccine Enhances Efficacy of VLP Vaccines Against Zika and Chikungunya Viruses.
Аннотация
Background/
Objectives
Mosquito-borne viruses cause substantial global morbidity and mortality. Mosquito saliva, secreted during biting, facilitates blood feeding and can enhance virus infection. Here, we evaluated whether combining virus-specific antigens with mosquito salivary protein-derived peptides improves protection in Zika virus (ZIKV) and chikungunya virus (CHIKV) mouse models.
Methods
Peptides from Aedes and Culex salivary proteins were selected based on conservation, predicted T-cell reactivity, and cellular and humoral immunogenicity in mice. Mice were immunised subcutaneously with a prime and boost two weeks apart using adjuvanted salivary peptides (SAL), commercial ZIKV- or CHIKV-like particles (VLPs), or salivary peptides combined with the relevant VLPs. Vaccine doses contained 0.5 µg VLPs and/or 10 nmol of each salivary peptide, formulated with Montanide ISA-51; when combined, VLPs and SAL were administered on opposite flanks. Two weeks after boosting, mice were challenged with ZIKV or CHIKV plus Aedes aegypti saliva. Challenge teams were blinded to group allocation until data analyses were complete.
Results
SAL enhanced the protective effect of VLP vaccination compared with VLPs alone. In the CHIKV model, CHIKV VLP + SAL prevented joint swelling and reduced infectious virus in the inoculated ankle and viral RNA in the contralateral ankle. In the ZIKV model, ZIKV VLP + SAL reduced viral RNA in skin and brain tissue and improved survival.
Conclusions
Mosquito salivary peptide antigens improved the protective efficacy of VLP vaccines against ZIKV and CHIKV in mouse models. Salivary antigens may provide a complementary vaccine component for multiple arboviruses transmitted by Aedes and Culex mosquitoes.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.