The OLGIMA system for gastric cancer risk assessment. A useful method based on the histological Sydney consensus.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Delgado Guillena Pedro Genaro, Cuatrecasas Miriam, Montori Sheyla, Felipez Varela Nayra, Llach Joan, Archilla Iva, Florez-Diez Pablo, Barreiro-Alonso Eva, Tejedor-Tejada Javier, Vicente Raquel, Soria M Teresa, Huerta Alaín, Ortega Silvia Patricia, Nuñez Henar, Patrón Oliver, Mangas Carolina, Zaffalon Diana, Hernández Luis, Yip Luis Enrique, Hontoria Gadea, Hijos Gonzalo, Domper-Arnal Maria Jose, Zarraquiños Sara, Herreros De Tejada Alberto, Córdoba Alicia, Cuestas Anabella, Fernández-Esparrach Glòria, Moreira Leticia, Albéniz Eduardo, EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Consortium
Аннотация
METHODS: A cross-sectional study of consecutive diagnostic gastroscopies in adults was designed. Systematic gastric biopsies were taken. The updated Sydney guidelines were used for histological grading of GA and IM. Higher GC risk was defined as OLGIM III-IV and advanced GA.
RESULTS: The OLGIMA stage was assessed based on the most severe GA and/or IM findings in both antrum and corpus. We included 998 patients (median age 57; 64% women; 35% Helicobacter pylori infection). Thirty-nine (3.9%) patients had higher GC risk: 17 (1.7%) with OLGIM III-IV; 12 (1.2%) with advanced GA, and 10 (1%) meeting both criteria. Among OLGIM 0-II, 12 (1.2%) patients had advanced GA. The OLGIMA system upstaged 39 (3.9%) patients to III-IV, being more sensitive than OLGIM.
CONCLUSIONS: The new OLGIMA system identifies patients at higher GC risk (OLGIMA III-IV), encompassing all OLGIM III-IV patients, and upstaging those OLGIM 0-II with advanced GA. This approach addresses the OLGA and OLGIM limitations by integrating GA and IM severity as recommended by the Updated Sydney consensus.