Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie · 2023
Regular penis-root masturbation: A promising behavioral treatment method for lifelong premature ejaculation.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Memik Omur, Voyvoda Bekir, Ustuner Murat, Karsli Onur, Halat Ahmed Omer, Ozcan Levent
Аннотация
AIM: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of penis-root masturbation (PRM), a newly defined behavioral therapy (BT) technique, in patients with unsuccessful medical treatment due to premature ejaculation (PE).
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 35 patients aged 25-43 years, who were diagnosed with lifelong PE. Patients and their partners were informed about the PRM technique and asked to practice PRM three times a week for three months, with or without sexual intercourse. The patients' Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) scores and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded and compared before PRM training (T0) and at the third (T3) month after the start of PRM training.
RESULTS: The mean±SD PEDT scores were 16.26±1.94 at T0, 10.63±1.14 at T3. When compared to T0, the PEDT values at T3 were significantly lower (P=0.021). In terms of IELT, the mean T3 values (192.43±56.71) were significantly longer (P=0.035) than at T0 (50.43±13.84seconds).
CONCLUSION: PRM BT shows promise for lifelong PE patients who do not benefit from or discontinue to pharmacotherapy. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 35 patients aged 25-43 years, who were diagnosed with lifelong PE. Patients and their partners were informed about the PRM technique and asked to practice PRM three times a week for three months, with or without sexual intercourse. The patients' Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) scores and intravaginal ejaculatory latency time (IELT) were recorded and compared before PRM training (T0) and at the third (T3) month after the start of PRM training.
RESULTS: The mean±SD PEDT scores were 16.26±1.94 at T0, 10.63±1.14 at T3. When compared to T0, the PEDT values at T3 were significantly lower (P=0.021). In terms of IELT, the mean T3 values (192.43±56.71) were significantly longer (P=0.035) than at T0 (50.43±13.84seconds).
CONCLUSION: PRM BT shows promise for lifelong PE patients who do not benefit from or discontinue to pharmacotherapy. Larger prospective trials are required to confirm these findings.