Cornea · 2010
Corneal graft surgery combined with subconjunctival bevacizumab (avastin).
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Symes Richard J, Poole Thomas R G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To describe the use of subconjunctival bevacizumab (Avastin) as an adjunctive treatment in a vascularized cornea at the time of lamellar keratoplasty to reduce the risk of graft rejection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a significant ocular high-velocity thermal injury, a patient developed extensive corneal scarring and a traumatic cataract. To improve vision, a corneal graft was indicated, but the presence of extensive neovascularization increased the risk of early graft rejection.
RESULTS: Bevacizumab was injected subconjunctivally before surgery to reduce the corneal vessel load. There was a dramatic response in terms of vessel regression, but this was short lived and the vessels quickly regrew. The subconjunctival bevacizumab injection was repeated at the time of combined cataract extraction and lamellar corneal graft surgery, and the feeder vessels were cauterized at the limbus. After 6 months, the graft remained clear of vessels.
CONCLUSIONS: This case is of interest because the eye was treated twice with subconjunctival bevacizumab with good short-term results in both instances but different longer-term outcomes in terms of vessel regrowth. This case suggests that the antiangiogenic effects of bevacizumab may be effectively harnessed at the time of a definitive surgical procedure, which reduces the stimulus for vessel regrowth.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: After a significant ocular high-velocity thermal injury, a patient developed extensive corneal scarring and a traumatic cataract. To improve vision, a corneal graft was indicated, but the presence of extensive neovascularization increased the risk of early graft rejection.
RESULTS: Bevacizumab was injected subconjunctivally before surgery to reduce the corneal vessel load. There was a dramatic response in terms of vessel regression, but this was short lived and the vessels quickly regrew. The subconjunctival bevacizumab injection was repeated at the time of combined cataract extraction and lamellar corneal graft surgery, and the feeder vessels were cauterized at the limbus. After 6 months, the graft remained clear of vessels.
CONCLUSIONS: This case is of interest because the eye was treated twice with subconjunctival bevacizumab with good short-term results in both instances but different longer-term outcomes in terms of vessel regrowth. This case suggests that the antiangiogenic effects of bevacizumab may be effectively harnessed at the time of a definitive surgical procedure, which reduces the stimulus for vessel regrowth.