European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) · 2023
Absence of lobular carcinoma in situ is a poor prognostic marker in invasive lobular carcinoma.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mouabbi Jason A, Raghavendra Akshara Singareeka, Bassett Roland L, Christgen Matthias, Middleton Lavinia, Teshome Mediget, Nasrazadani Azadeh, Hortobagyi Gabriel, Hassan Amy, Tripathy Debasish, Layman Rachel M
Аннотация
AIM: To determine if the outcomes of patients with ILC co-occurring with LCIS are similar to pure ILC and if the presence of LCIS is a prognostic factor for ILC.
METHODS: In an observational, population-based investigation using data from the MD Anderson breast cancer prospectively collected electronic database, we analysed patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III ILC. Patients were divided into two groups: those with ILC with co-occurring ipsilateral LCIS (ILC + LCIS) and those with pure ILC without a histologically detected co-occurring ipsilateral LCIS (ILC alone). We obtained data on demographics, pathologic tumour size (pT), pathologic lymph node (pN) involvement, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) receptor status, HER2 status, Ki67, treatment received, distant recurrence-free and overall survival (DRFS, OS).
RESULTS: We identified 4217 patients with stage I-III ILC treated at MD Anderson between 1966 and 2021. 45% of cases (n = 1881) had co-existing LCIS. Statistically and numerically, ILC alone tended to associate with pT4 and pN3 stage (P < 0.001), ER/PR negativity (P = 0.0002), HER2 positivity (P = 0.010), higher Ki67 (P = 0.005), non-classical ILC subtype (P = 0.04) and more exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.0002) compared to the ILC + LCIS group. The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. Patients with ILC + LCIS had better median DRFS (16.8 versus 10.1 years, Hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.60, P < 0.0001) and better median OS (18.9 versus 13.7 years, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.56-0.69; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed the absence of LCIS to be an independent poor prognostic factor along with a higher pT stage and higher pN stage for DRFS and OS.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that the absence of ipsilateral LCIS with ILC is an independent poor prognostic factor and that further studies are warranted to understand this phenomenon.
METHODS: In an observational, population-based investigation using data from the MD Anderson breast cancer prospectively collected electronic database, we analysed patients with a diagnosis of stage I-III ILC. Patients were divided into two groups: those with ILC with co-occurring ipsilateral LCIS (ILC + LCIS) and those with pure ILC without a histologically detected co-occurring ipsilateral LCIS (ILC alone). We obtained data on demographics, pathologic tumour size (pT), pathologic lymph node (pN) involvement, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR) receptor status, HER2 status, Ki67, treatment received, distant recurrence-free and overall survival (DRFS, OS).
RESULTS: We identified 4217 patients with stage I-III ILC treated at MD Anderson between 1966 and 2021. 45% of cases (n = 1881) had co-existing LCIS. Statistically and numerically, ILC alone tended to associate with pT4 and pN3 stage (P < 0.001), ER/PR negativity (P = 0.0002), HER2 positivity (P = 0.010), higher Ki67 (P = 0.005), non-classical ILC subtype (P = 0.04) and more exposure to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = 0.0002) compared to the ILC + LCIS group. The median follow-up time was 6.5 years. Patients with ILC + LCIS had better median DRFS (16.8 versus 10.1 years, Hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.60, P < 0.0001) and better median OS (18.9 versus 13.7 years, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.56-0.69; P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed the absence of LCIS to be an independent poor prognostic factor along with a higher pT stage and higher pN stage for DRFS and OS.
CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggests that the absence of ipsilateral LCIS with ILC is an independent poor prognostic factor and that further studies are warranted to understand this phenomenon.