Phlebology · 2026
Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of incompetent perforating veins in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ibaragi Yasuhiko, Kikuchi Seiya, Komatsu Kanshi
Аннотация
ObjectivesIncompetent perforating veins (IPVs) are important contributors to chronic venous disease (CVD), yet their clinical significance remains incompletely understood. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and ultrasonographic characteristics associated with IPVs in patients undergoing endovenous treatment for varicose veins.MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on 192 limbs treated between 2021 and 2025. Limbs were categorized into IPV-positive and IPV-negative groups based on duplex ultrasonography. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical-Etiological-Anatomical-Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. Multivariable logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis were performed to identify predictors of IPV presence.ResultsAmong 192 limbs, IPVs were identified in 102 (53.1%). Multivariable analysis identified saphenofemoral junction (SFJ) diameter as an independent predictor of IPV (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.08-1.49; p = 0.005). ROC analysis revealed an optimal cutoff for SFJ diameter of 7.75 mm for predicting IPV (Area Under the Curve [AUC]: 0.646; sensitivity 65.0%, specificity 65.2%). CEAP classification was numerically higher in the IPV-positive group (3.11 vs 2.86), although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.379).ConclusionSFJ diameter was independently associated with IPV presence and may serve as a practical ultrasonographic marker for identifying perforator incompetence in patients with varicose veins. Standardized duplex ultrasonography, including assessment of SFJ diameter, may facilitate objective treatment planning.