BMJ open · 2024
Comparison of I-gel and Baska mask in elective surgery: a meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСравнительное исследованиеОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Shen Jiaxin, Miao Xiaoyun, Wang Hao, Zhao Jinglin, Shi Jiaxiao, Dai Qingchun
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The supraglottic airway device is a viable alternative to tracheal intubation for elective surgery. To conduct a comparative analysis of the advantages and disadvantages associated with use of the Baska mask and I-gel across various dimensions.
DESIGN: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other relevant databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who used the Baska mask and I-gel.
MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified for comparison of clinical indices. The Baska mask device demonstrated general feasibility in oropharyngeal leak pressure at insertion time and 30 min post-insertion, as well as in the assessment of dysphonia. However, the I-gel had superior efficacy in reducing sore throat compared with the Baska mask.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, the Baska mask demonstrates superior intraoperative performance compared with I-gel; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of a sore throat post-extubation. Nevertheless, the overall quality of existing studies is suboptimal, underscoring the need for additional high-quality RCTs to substantiate these findings.
DESIGN: A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and other relevant databases to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) involving patients who used the Baska mask and I-gel.
MAIN RESULTS: Twelve studies were identified for comparison of clinical indices. The Baska mask device demonstrated general feasibility in oropharyngeal leak pressure at insertion time and 30 min post-insertion, as well as in the assessment of dysphonia. However, the I-gel had superior efficacy in reducing sore throat compared with the Baska mask.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on current evidence, the Baska mask demonstrates superior intraoperative performance compared with I-gel; however, it is associated with a higher incidence of a sore throat post-extubation. Nevertheless, the overall quality of existing studies is suboptimal, underscoring the need for additional high-quality RCTs to substantiate these findings.