BMC gastroenterology · 2024
Anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies to diagnose irritable bowel syndrome in inflammatory bowel disease patients.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Barros Luisa Leite, Leite Gabriela, Morales Walter, Barlow Gillian M, de Azevedo Matheus Freitas Cardoso, de Sousa Carlos Alexandre, Damião Adérson Omar Mourão Cintra, Pimentel Mark, Farias Alberto Queiroz
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Despite adequate treatment, a subgroup of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn`s disease and ulcerative colitis, have persistent gastrointestinal symptoms that are not always related to mucosal damage. Recently, two autoantibodies, anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin, were validated as post-infectious IBS (PI-IBS) markers, however there is limited evidence of its diagnostic role in IBD population.
METHODS: Patients with more than 3 bowel movements/day and indication of colonoscopy were enrolled. Samples were collected at the time of colonoscopy for assessment of serum levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies.
RESULTS: A total of 160 subjects were included in 4 groups: active IBD (n = 44); quiescent IBD and chronic diarrhea IBD-IBS (n = 25); predominant-diarrhea IBS (n = 45) and controls (n = 46). The mean value of the optical density for anti-CdtB was 1.2 ± 0.65 in group 1, 1.27 ± 0.64 in group 2, 1.49 ± 0.47 in the group 3 and 1.6 ± 0.68 in group 4, p = 0.012. For anti-vinculin, optical densities were: 1.34 ± 0.78 in group 1, 1.46 ± 0.92 in group 2, 1.31 ± 0.79 in group 3 and 1.41 ± 0.86 for controls (p = 0.875). Using a cut-off of 1.56 for anti-CdtB, the positivity between groups was n = 10 (22.7%) in group 1, n = 9 (34.6%) in group 2, 19 (43.2%) in group 3, 21 (45.7%) in group 4 (p = 0.106). The positivity of anti-vinculin using a cut-off of 1.6 was n = 18 (40.9%) in group 1, n = 11 (42.3%), n = 15 (34.1%), n = 22 (47.8%) (p = 0.622).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin could not identify IBD-IBS patients or discriminate IBS-D from healthy controls.
METHODS: Patients with more than 3 bowel movements/day and indication of colonoscopy were enrolled. Samples were collected at the time of colonoscopy for assessment of serum levels of anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin antibodies.
RESULTS: A total of 160 subjects were included in 4 groups: active IBD (n = 44); quiescent IBD and chronic diarrhea IBD-IBS (n = 25); predominant-diarrhea IBS (n = 45) and controls (n = 46). The mean value of the optical density for anti-CdtB was 1.2 ± 0.65 in group 1, 1.27 ± 0.64 in group 2, 1.49 ± 0.47 in the group 3 and 1.6 ± 0.68 in group 4, p = 0.012. For anti-vinculin, optical densities were: 1.34 ± 0.78 in group 1, 1.46 ± 0.92 in group 2, 1.31 ± 0.79 in group 3 and 1.41 ± 0.86 for controls (p = 0.875). Using a cut-off of 1.56 for anti-CdtB, the positivity between groups was n = 10 (22.7%) in group 1, n = 9 (34.6%) in group 2, 19 (43.2%) in group 3, 21 (45.7%) in group 4 (p = 0.106). The positivity of anti-vinculin using a cut-off of 1.6 was n = 18 (40.9%) in group 1, n = 11 (42.3%), n = 15 (34.1%), n = 22 (47.8%) (p = 0.622).
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that anti-CdtB and anti-vinculin could not identify IBD-IBS patients or discriminate IBS-D from healthy controls.