DOI 10.17116/hirurgia202510173
[Laparoscopic anterior and posterior rectopexy using two mesh implants for rectal prolapse in men].
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To describe the immediate and long-term results of laparoscopic anterior and posterior rectopexy using two mesh implants in men with rectal prolapse.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
The authors present surgical treatment of 5 male patients with rectal prolapse between 2017 and 2022. They underwent nerve-sparing laparoscopic anterior and posterior rectopexy using two macroporous partially absorbable monofilament mesh implants. Mean age of patients was 35.4±13.3 years, mean preoperative duration of disease - 3.5 years.
RESULTS
All surgeries were laparoscopic. Mean surgery time was 173±21.7 min. No intraoperative complications were noted. In postoperative period, 1 patient developed perforation of sigmoid colon diverticulum that required redo surgery. Mean postoperative hospital stay was 7±3.3 days, postoperative follow-up - 50.1 (32-94) months. There were no recurrences or complications associated with mesh implant or sutures throughout the follow-up period. Mean Wexner score before treatment was 11.8, after treatment - 2.6. Mean Ryzhikh score before treatment was 9.4, after treatment - 2.4, mean PFDI-20 score before treatment - 19.4, after treatment - 4.6.
CONCLUSION
Laparoscopic anteroposterior rectopexy with double mesh implant in men with rectal prolapse resulted in favorable functional outcomes and quality of life. No recurrence of disease or complications related to mesh implants were observed. Conclusions are limited by small sample size, and further studies are needed to standardize surgical treatment of rectal prolapse in men.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.