Risk management and healthcare policy · 2025
Economic Burden and Prevention Strategies for Nosocomial Infections in Ophthalmic Surgery Under the Diagnosis-Related Group Payment Model.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhang Xin, Gao Zhenwu, Niu Yanbin, Hao Ruixia, Zhang RongQian, Duan Yanqing
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the economic burden of ophthalmic surgery-related nosocomial infections under the diagnosis-related group (DRG) model payment mode and optimise prevention and control strategies.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was used to analyse the hospitalisation days and expenses of patients with nosocomial infection after cataract surgery in our hospital in 2020 and 2021 and compared with patients without infection in the same group of DRGs in the same period.
RESULTS: In terms of hospitalisation days and expenses, the average hospitalisation time and average hospitalisation expenses of the infection group in 2020 were higher than those of the non-infection group. In 2021, the average hospitalisation time and the average hospitalisation expenses in the infected group were also higher than those in the non-infected group. The results of the root cause analysis showed that there were many issues in the infection-after-cataract-surgery group in the hospital related to hand hygiene and environmental cleaning and disinfection. Targeted improvement programmes were formulated accordingly, including attaching great importance to the prevention and control of infection after cataract surgery and implementing the full infection prevention and control training system. The adenosine triphosphate fluorescence detection and video surveillance methods were used to monitor the hand hygiene status of medical staff.
CONCLUSION: Diagnosis-related grouping puts forward higher requirements for both hospital costs and quality management. Hospital infection after cataract surgery can significantly affect treatment quality, increase medical costs and increase the economic burden of patients.
METHODS: Retrospective analysis was used to analyse the hospitalisation days and expenses of patients with nosocomial infection after cataract surgery in our hospital in 2020 and 2021 and compared with patients without infection in the same group of DRGs in the same period.
RESULTS: In terms of hospitalisation days and expenses, the average hospitalisation time and average hospitalisation expenses of the infection group in 2020 were higher than those of the non-infection group. In 2021, the average hospitalisation time and the average hospitalisation expenses in the infected group were also higher than those in the non-infected group. The results of the root cause analysis showed that there were many issues in the infection-after-cataract-surgery group in the hospital related to hand hygiene and environmental cleaning and disinfection. Targeted improvement programmes were formulated accordingly, including attaching great importance to the prevention and control of infection after cataract surgery and implementing the full infection prevention and control training system. The adenosine triphosphate fluorescence detection and video surveillance methods were used to monitor the hand hygiene status of medical staff.
CONCLUSION: Diagnosis-related grouping puts forward higher requirements for both hospital costs and quality management. Hospital infection after cataract surgery can significantly affect treatment quality, increase medical costs and increase the economic burden of patients.