Alternative therapies in health and medicine · 2022
Clinical Observation of Treatment Efficacy in Critical Paralytic Ileus Disease with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Hongjun, Jing Guangwu, Yin Yan, Zhong Baoliang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy of the combination of Da-Cheng-Qi Decoction (DCQD) injected into the jejunum and as an enema in patients with critical diseases with paralytic ileus.
METHODS: In our double-blind randomized controlled study, 114 critically ill patients with paralytic ileus were divided into 2 groups. The control group received conventional medical treatment, and the DCQD group was treated with integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine. The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function, clinical efficacy and intensive care unit (ICU) stay in the 2 groups were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: The IAP in the DCQD group was lower than in the control group (P < .05). The recovery of GI function and clinical efficacy rate in the DCQD group were significantly better than in the control group (P < .05, respectively).
CONCLUSION: DCQD may be an effective method for treating patients with critical diseases with paralytic ileus and is worthy of clinical application.
METHODS: In our double-blind randomized controlled study, 114 critically ill patients with paralytic ileus were divided into 2 groups. The control group received conventional medical treatment, and the DCQD group was treated with integrated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and Western medicine. The intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), recovery of gastrointestinal (GI) function, clinical efficacy and intensive care unit (ICU) stay in the 2 groups were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: The IAP in the DCQD group was lower than in the control group (P < .05). The recovery of GI function and clinical efficacy rate in the DCQD group were significantly better than in the control group (P < .05, respectively).
CONCLUSION: DCQD may be an effective method for treating patients with critical diseases with paralytic ileus and is worthy of clinical application.