Journal of intellectual & developmental disability · 2026
Collaborative play in a mentalisation-based serious game for adults with intellectual disabilities.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mesker Mitchel, Derks Suzanne D M, Sterkenburg Paula S
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: People with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities often struggle with mentalising and stress regulation because of developmental delays. Mentalisation-based serious games offer an accessible, engaging way to support them. Adding collaborative play may further enhance effectiveness through communicative interaction.
METHOD: Participants (n = 82) played the mentalisation-based game 'You & I' with a professional caregiver, matched to RCT data from playing alone. Linear mixed models were used to analyse the data on mentalisation and stress regulation, and social validity was investigated.
RESULTS: Collaborative play did not significantly affect mentalising or stress regulation compared to playing alone. Social validity ratings indicated that collaborative play was anticipated and experienced positively.
CONCLUSION: Findings should be interpreted considering non-randomisation, limited reliability, and absence of pre-intervention caregiver training. Further research should examine mechanisms linking communicative behaviours to mentalisation and develop reliable instruments for people with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.
METHOD: Participants (n = 82) played the mentalisation-based game 'You & I' with a professional caregiver, matched to RCT data from playing alone. Linear mixed models were used to analyse the data on mentalisation and stress regulation, and social validity was investigated.
RESULTS: Collaborative play did not significantly affect mentalising or stress regulation compared to playing alone. Social validity ratings indicated that collaborative play was anticipated and experienced positively.
CONCLUSION: Findings should be interpreted considering non-randomisation, limited reliability, and absence of pre-intervention caregiver training. Further research should examine mechanisms linking communicative behaviours to mentalisation and develop reliable instruments for people with mild to borderline intellectual disabilities.