Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2001
A clinical and histologic comparison of electrosurgical and carbon dioxide laser peels.
Клиническое исследованиеСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Acland K M, Calonje E, Seed P T, Stat C, Barlow R J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: A radiofrequency-controlled electrosurgical device (ESD) has been adapted for skin peeling. A high-voltage, low-amperage current converts an irrigant into an ionized vapor, causing molecular dissociation and superficial damage in adjacent tissue.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical and histologic effects of a scanning carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser (ESC/Sharplan 40C) and the ESD (Visage Cosmetic Surgery System, Arthrocare).
METHODS: This study was a matched clinical trial involving 9 subjects. Two strips (2 x 1 cm) of skin on the temple were alternately assigned to receive 2 passes with either the CO(2) laser (Silktouch mode, 260 handpiece, fluence 15 J/cm(2), 10 mm(2)) or the ESD (125 V = setting 4, 5 mm handpiece). Strips were wiped with moist gauze after the first pass, and 4-mm punch biopsy specimens were taken immediately and after 3 months. Clinical assessment of re-epithelialization, erythema, and hyperpigmentation was made at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Median erythema scores were significantly greater in skin treated with the CO(2) laser. Histologic examination showed greater epidermal loss and a significantly thicker zone of underlying thermal damage (average difference, 63 microm; 95% confidence interval, 40-87; P =.0002) in skin treated with the CO(2) laser compared with skin treated with the ESD. After 3 months, a band of superficial dermal fibrosis was thicker in skin treated with the CO(2) laser (average difference, 170 microm; 95% confidence interval, 69-271; P =.0075).
CONCLUSION: Two passes with the ESD elicited a more superficial skin peel than the CO(2) laser. Despite minimal thermal damage, superficial dermal fibrosis was seen at 3 months in skin treated with the ESD.
OBJECTIVE: We compared the clinical and histologic effects of a scanning carbon dioxide (CO(2)) laser (ESC/Sharplan 40C) and the ESD (Visage Cosmetic Surgery System, Arthrocare).
METHODS: This study was a matched clinical trial involving 9 subjects. Two strips (2 x 1 cm) of skin on the temple were alternately assigned to receive 2 passes with either the CO(2) laser (Silktouch mode, 260 handpiece, fluence 15 J/cm(2), 10 mm(2)) or the ESD (125 V = setting 4, 5 mm handpiece). Strips were wiped with moist gauze after the first pass, and 4-mm punch biopsy specimens were taken immediately and after 3 months. Clinical assessment of re-epithelialization, erythema, and hyperpigmentation was made at 1, 2, 4, and 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Median erythema scores were significantly greater in skin treated with the CO(2) laser. Histologic examination showed greater epidermal loss and a significantly thicker zone of underlying thermal damage (average difference, 63 microm; 95% confidence interval, 40-87; P =.0002) in skin treated with the CO(2) laser compared with skin treated with the ESD. After 3 months, a band of superficial dermal fibrosis was thicker in skin treated with the CO(2) laser (average difference, 170 microm; 95% confidence interval, 69-271; P =.0075).
CONCLUSION: Two passes with the ESD elicited a more superficial skin peel than the CO(2) laser. Despite minimal thermal damage, superficial dermal fibrosis was seen at 3 months in skin treated with the ESD.