MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/jcm15031062

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical medicine · 2026

Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Paragangliomas: A Retrospective 23-Year Analysis.

Cepni Kimia, Dagdelen Meltem, Oner Huseyin, Cepni Bahar, Kiziltan Huriye Senay, Uzel Omer Erol

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

Head and neck paragangliomas (HNPGs) are rare, typically benign, hypervascular tumors arising from neural crest cells. Although surgery is known as the primary treatment, radiotherapy (RT) is preferred for large and inoperable tumors. This study evaluated the results and safety of RT.

Methods

Fifteen patients with radiologically or histologically confirmed HNPG treated with RT between 2001 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Most patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with a median dose of 45 Gy. Treatment-related toxicities were graded according to CTCAE criteria. Local control (LC) was estimated with using Wilson score method.

Results

With a median follow-up of 96 months, all patients achieved stable or improved symptomes, without local recurrence, resulting in a 100% LC rate. RT was well tolerated, with no acute or late toxicities ≥ grade 2.

Conclusions

RT, particularly IMRT, provides excellent long-term LC with minimal toxicity in patients with HNPG. RT represents an effective and well-tolerated treatment option, especially for patients with unresectable disease or high surgical risk.

Для цитирования: Cepni Kimia, Dagdelen Meltem, Oner Huseyin, Cepni Bahar, Kiziltan Huriye Senay, Uzel Omer Erol. Efficacy and Safety of Radiotherapy in Head and Neck Paragangliomas: A Retrospective 23-Year Analysis.. Journal of clinical medicine. 2026. DOI: 10.3390/jcm15031062.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.