The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2018
Case Report: Misleading Serological Diagnosis of Paracoccidioidomycosis in a Young Patient with the Acute Form Disease: Paracoccidioides brasiliensis or Paracoccidioides lutzii?
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Buccheri Renata, Morais Vanessa Dos Santos, Kamikawa Camila Mika, Vidal Monica Scarpelli Martinelli, Naves Gabriel, Del Negro Gilda Maria Barbaro, Vicentini Adriana Pardini, Benard Gil
Аннотация
Negative results in serological routine screening of patients with microbiologically proven Paracoccidioidomycosis (PCM) are occasionally reported. Failure in detecting anti-Paracoccidioides antibodies has been ascribed to factors either related to serological techniques or to the status of the host immune reactivity. Recently, this issue has been renewed by the recognition that the Paracoccidioides genera comprises two species, lutzii and brasiliensis, which have distinct antigenic profiles and, therefore, may elicit different host antibody responses. We describe a patient with the acute form PCM due to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis with negative results on two reference centers' routine screening for P. brasiliensis antibodies, but positive results with Paracoccidioides lutzii antigens. The present case report suggests that antibodies elicited during P. brasiliensis infection recognize antigenic fractions shared by both species, highlighting the difficulties in distinguishing the two infections by means of the currently available routine serological assays.