Annals of vascular surgery · 2024
Avoiding Complications with Transcarotid Artery Revascularization.
СтатьяОбзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lewis Anthony J, Maningat Alexandra, Salzler Gregory G, Ryer Evan J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) for carotid artery stenting offers an innovative method for treating carotid artery occlusive disease. This technique utilizes the ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System (Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, CA) to temporarily reverse flow in the carotid artery prior to crossing or treating the carotid lesion, reducing the perioperative risk of stroke. This review aims to summarize possible complications associated with the procedure and offer suggestions to address or avoid these issues in practice.
METHODS: A review of the available scientific literature was performed via PubMed database queries. Our institutional experience with TCAR was reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes assessed included perioperative complications and overall rates of re-stenosis after TCAR.
RESULTS: Potential complications of TCAR were identified and summarized. These are organized based on preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative timing of the potential complication. Our group's real-world outcomes of 273 patients undergoing TCAR with median (interquartile range) follow up of 17.4 (4.4 -38.7) months, including safety and restenosis data, are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Herein we summarize the available literature regarding potential complications that may be encountered when performing TCAR. Safe and effective clinical outcomes, comparable to those of published clinical trial data, can be successfully achieved in the real-world setting.
METHODS: A review of the available scientific literature was performed via PubMed database queries. Our institutional experience with TCAR was reviewed from a prospectively maintained database. Outcomes assessed included perioperative complications and overall rates of re-stenosis after TCAR.
RESULTS: Potential complications of TCAR were identified and summarized. These are organized based on preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative timing of the potential complication. Our group's real-world outcomes of 273 patients undergoing TCAR with median (interquartile range) follow up of 17.4 (4.4 -38.7) months, including safety and restenosis data, are presented.
CONCLUSIONS: Herein we summarize the available literature regarding potential complications that may be encountered when performing TCAR. Safe and effective clinical outcomes, comparable to those of published clinical trial data, can be successfully achieved in the real-world setting.