Retina (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2022
THE IMPACT OF THE VITREOMACULAR INTERFACE ON FUNCTIONAL AND ANATOMICAL OUTCOMES IN DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA TREATED WITH THREE DIFFERENT ANTI-VEGF AGENTS: Post Hoc Analysis of The Protocol T Study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Mylonas Georgios, Najeeb Bilal Haj, Goldbach Felix, Deak Gabor G, Michl Martin, Brugger Jonas, Schmidt-Erfurth Ursula, Gerendas Bianca S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of baseline vitreomacular interface status on treatment outcomes in patients treated with three different anti-vascular endothelial growth factors for diabetic macular edema.
METHODS: Post hoc analysis from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed at baseline and at the end of follow-up to identify the presence of complete vitreomacular adhesion, partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome, and complete posterior vitreous detachment.
RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty-nine eyes were eligible for the study based on the study criteria. Complete adhesion eyes gained on average +3.7 more ETDRS letters compared with the complete posterior vitreous detachment group at the end of the 12 months follow-up ( P < 0.001). Baseline vitreomacular interface status had no significant influence on central subfield thickness at 12 months ( P = 0.144). There was no difference between the treatment arms based on effect of baseline vitreomacular interface status on best-corrected visual acuity gain.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that vitreomacular interface status affects functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. The presence of complete or partial vitreomacular adhesion at baseline may be associated with a larger treatment benefit than those with complete posterior vitreous detachment.
METHODS: Post hoc analysis from patients enrolled in the DRCR.net Protocol T study. Optical coherence tomography images were analyzed at baseline and at the end of follow-up to identify the presence of complete vitreomacular adhesion, partial vitreomacular adhesion, vitreomacular traction syndrome, and complete posterior vitreous detachment.
RESULTS: Six hundred and twenty-nine eyes were eligible for the study based on the study criteria. Complete adhesion eyes gained on average +3.7 more ETDRS letters compared with the complete posterior vitreous detachment group at the end of the 12 months follow-up ( P < 0.001). Baseline vitreomacular interface status had no significant influence on central subfield thickness at 12 months ( P = 0.144). There was no difference between the treatment arms based on effect of baseline vitreomacular interface status on best-corrected visual acuity gain.
CONCLUSION: This study provides evidence that vitreomacular interface status affects functional outcomes in diabetic macular edema patients treated with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections. The presence of complete or partial vitreomacular adhesion at baseline may be associated with a larger treatment benefit than those with complete posterior vitreous detachment.