Life sciences · 2020
Tadalafil versus linaclotide in gastrointestinal dysfunction and depressive behavior in constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sedky Amina Ahmed, Magdy Yosra
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Intestinal GC-C/cGMP pathway may be involved in visceral hypersensitivity and fluid secretion in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The guanylcyclase C agonist linaclotide, approved for IBS- constipation, is contraindicated in children as it may cause severe diarrhea. In contrast, drugs increasing cGMP by inhibiting phosphodiesterase 5 (PDE-5) are well tolerated in children with pulmonary hypertension. Accordingly, we investigated whether beneficial effects of linaclotide in IBS might be shared by PDE-5inhibitor tadalafil without the severe diarrhea reported for linaclotide. Since depression is commonly comorbid with IBS and is implicated in its pathophysiology; and since tadalafil is absorbed systemically and crosses blood brain barrier, whereas linaclotide does not, impact of both drugs on behavioral changes in IBS was also investigated.
METHODS: 72 rats were divided into 6groups (control naive, control tadalafil, control linaclotide, untreated IBS, IBS tadalafil, and IBS linaclotide-treated). IBS was induced by 0 to 4 °C intragastric saline for 14 days.
RESULTS: Both drugs reduced visceral hypersensitivity and colonic C fos. Tadalafil, and to a greater extent, linaclotide increased colonic cGMP, fecal pellets (8.66 ± 4.6 (IBS),versus14.8 ± 3.3(tadalafil), 20 ± 1.2(linaclotide), fecal water content (29.8 ± 5.5 (IBS), versus 47.83 ± 12.6 (tadalafil), 63.58 ± 11.6 (linaclotide) and reduced intestinal transit time (% distance travelled: 29 ± 6.1(IBS), versus 40.58 + 7.5(tadalafil), 51.83 ± 8.3(linaclotide). Tadalafil, but not linaclotide, increased hippocampal cGMP, and improved behavioral tests scores compared to linaclotide (immobility time: 97.3 ± 12.5 s (IBS) versus 68 ± 12.8(tadalafil), 80 ± 17.06 (linaclotide).
CONCLUSION: Systemic PDE-5 inhibitors might be alternatives to locally acting guanyl cyclase agonists in IBS, inducing less severe diarrhea and more beneficial effects on the associated behavioral changes.
METHODS: 72 rats were divided into 6groups (control naive, control tadalafil, control linaclotide, untreated IBS, IBS tadalafil, and IBS linaclotide-treated). IBS was induced by 0 to 4 °C intragastric saline for 14 days.
RESULTS: Both drugs reduced visceral hypersensitivity and colonic C fos. Tadalafil, and to a greater extent, linaclotide increased colonic cGMP, fecal pellets (8.66 ± 4.6 (IBS),versus14.8 ± 3.3(tadalafil), 20 ± 1.2(linaclotide), fecal water content (29.8 ± 5.5 (IBS), versus 47.83 ± 12.6 (tadalafil), 63.58 ± 11.6 (linaclotide) and reduced intestinal transit time (% distance travelled: 29 ± 6.1(IBS), versus 40.58 + 7.5(tadalafil), 51.83 ± 8.3(linaclotide). Tadalafil, but not linaclotide, increased hippocampal cGMP, and improved behavioral tests scores compared to linaclotide (immobility time: 97.3 ± 12.5 s (IBS) versus 68 ± 12.8(tadalafil), 80 ± 17.06 (linaclotide).
CONCLUSION: Systemic PDE-5 inhibitors might be alternatives to locally acting guanyl cyclase agonists in IBS, inducing less severe diarrhea and more beneficial effects on the associated behavioral changes.