Progress in orthodontics · 2025
Biomechanical effects of attachment designs in maxillary first molar mesialization with clear aligners: a finite element study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Vatansever Resul, Gurel Hakan Gurcan, Koc Osman
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Clear aligners face biomechanical limitations in complex tooth movements, particularly first molar mesialization, despite attachment use. Finite element analysis (FEA) can elucidate optimal attachment designs for force delivery.
OBJECTIVES: To compare displacement patterns and stress distribution during maxillary first molar mesialization using four attachment designs via 3D FEA.
METHODS: A maxillary model (MRI-derived) was created with periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bone, and clear aligner (0.75 mm thickness). Five scenarios were simulated: no attachment (Model-I), vertical rectangular (Model-II), horizontal rectangular (Model-III), optimized double semi-ellipsoidal (Model-IV), and Yin-Yang attachments (Model-V). Mesial displacement (0.5 mm) was applied, and deformation/stress were analyzed using ANSYS Workbench.
RESULTS: Model-IV (optimized attachment) demonstrated the least first molar tipping, evidenced by its lowest total mesial crown displacement (0.319 mm), and provided the best mesiodistal control. Conversely, Model-I (no attachment) exhibited the highest tipping, with a total mesial crown displacement of 0.376 mm. Yin-Yang attachments (Model-V) significantly reduced buccal displacement by 92% compared to Model-I. Horizontal rectangular attachments minimized rotational movement.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimized double semi-ellipsoidal attachments provide superior first molar mesialization control, while Yin-Yang designs enhance buccal-lingual stability. Attachment geometry critically influences aligner efficacy.
OBJECTIVES: To compare displacement patterns and stress distribution during maxillary first molar mesialization using four attachment designs via 3D FEA.
METHODS: A maxillary model (MRI-derived) was created with periodontal ligament (PDL), alveolar bone, and clear aligner (0.75 mm thickness). Five scenarios were simulated: no attachment (Model-I), vertical rectangular (Model-II), horizontal rectangular (Model-III), optimized double semi-ellipsoidal (Model-IV), and Yin-Yang attachments (Model-V). Mesial displacement (0.5 mm) was applied, and deformation/stress were analyzed using ANSYS Workbench.
RESULTS: Model-IV (optimized attachment) demonstrated the least first molar tipping, evidenced by its lowest total mesial crown displacement (0.319 mm), and provided the best mesiodistal control. Conversely, Model-I (no attachment) exhibited the highest tipping, with a total mesial crown displacement of 0.376 mm. Yin-Yang attachments (Model-V) significantly reduced buccal displacement by 92% compared to Model-I. Horizontal rectangular attachments minimized rotational movement.
CONCLUSIONS: Optimized double semi-ellipsoidal attachments provide superior first molar mesialization control, while Yin-Yang designs enhance buccal-lingual stability. Attachment geometry critically influences aligner efficacy.