medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025
Tasks for assessing dystonia in young people with cerebral palsy.
СтатьяПрепринтНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Lott Emma, Rust Alyssa, Dure Leon, Fehlings Darcy, Pearson Toni, Pons Roser, Mink Jonathan W, Aravamuthan Bhooma R
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Dystonia in childhood is typically associated with cerebral palsy (CP). Dystonia severity scales for CP require prolonged exam protocols with numerous tasks, often making them onerous for routine clinical use.
OBJECTIVE: To identify which individual tasks best approximate dystonia severity compared to the gold standard full protocol.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, comprehensive exam protocol videos were taken during routine care of ambulatory people with CP age 5 and up. Five pediatric dystonia experts reviewed individual tasks and the full protocol for dystonia using the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale. Experts' written scoring justifications were qualitatively analyzed to determine commonly cited features of dystonia.
RESULTS: When examining the difference in dystonia severity ratings between each task and the full protocol, seated upper extremity tasks had the lowest variance (p<0.05, F-test) and had lower score differences than the stand/walk/run and seated lower extremity tasks (p<0.05, repeated measures Friedman test). Experts most commonly identified the following movements as dystonic: wrist flexion (8.4% of all movement statements), finger flexion (7.3%), wrist ulnar deviation (6.8%), toe dorsiflexion (8.4%), ankle inversion (7.9%), and ankle plantarflexion (6.4%). Experts rated dystonic movements as more severe if they were consistently triggered by multiple stimuli (26.8% of all severity statements) or functionally impactful (20.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Seated upper extremity tasks may be valuable for identifying dystonia and estimating its severity during routine clinical care. Clinical dystonia severity assessment could be guided by assessing specific dystonic movements, the consistency with which they are triggered, and their functional impact. Cerebral palsy is the most common motor disability across the lifespan and is commonly associated with dystonia, a debilitating, frequently painful, and often treatment refractory movement disorder.1-3 Dystonia in CP affects up to 2 of every 1000 people in the US, comparable to the prevalence of Parkinson's disease.3-5 However, despite its high prevalence and high impact, there are no data-driven treatment paradigms for dystonia in CP.6,7 Developing data-driven treatments requires the ability to assess dystonia severity in a standardized way across centers to facilitate large scale clinical trials. However, current dystonia severity assessments have been criticized for requiring prolonged video recordings or in person assessments (often lasting more than 30 minutes).8,9 This can be both expensive (requiring many personnel hours) and exhausting for people with CP to execute. Furthermore, the longer these severity assessments take, the less feasible they are to execute during routine clinical care, making it difficult to clinically assess the impact of dystonia treatments. Therefore, of the many tasks currently used across dystonia severity assessments, it would be valuable to determine the subset of tasks most useful for assessing dystonia in young people with CP.
OBJECTIVE: To identify which individual tasks best approximate dystonia severity compared to the gold standard full protocol.
METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, comprehensive exam protocol videos were taken during routine care of ambulatory people with CP age 5 and up. Five pediatric dystonia experts reviewed individual tasks and the full protocol for dystonia using the Global Dystonia Severity Rating Scale. Experts' written scoring justifications were qualitatively analyzed to determine commonly cited features of dystonia.
RESULTS: When examining the difference in dystonia severity ratings between each task and the full protocol, seated upper extremity tasks had the lowest variance (p<0.05, F-test) and had lower score differences than the stand/walk/run and seated lower extremity tasks (p<0.05, repeated measures Friedman test). Experts most commonly identified the following movements as dystonic: wrist flexion (8.4% of all movement statements), finger flexion (7.3%), wrist ulnar deviation (6.8%), toe dorsiflexion (8.4%), ankle inversion (7.9%), and ankle plantarflexion (6.4%). Experts rated dystonic movements as more severe if they were consistently triggered by multiple stimuli (26.8% of all severity statements) or functionally impactful (20.7%).
CONCLUSIONS: Seated upper extremity tasks may be valuable for identifying dystonia and estimating its severity during routine clinical care. Clinical dystonia severity assessment could be guided by assessing specific dystonic movements, the consistency with which they are triggered, and their functional impact. Cerebral palsy is the most common motor disability across the lifespan and is commonly associated with dystonia, a debilitating, frequently painful, and often treatment refractory movement disorder.1-3 Dystonia in CP affects up to 2 of every 1000 people in the US, comparable to the prevalence of Parkinson's disease.3-5 However, despite its high prevalence and high impact, there are no data-driven treatment paradigms for dystonia in CP.6,7 Developing data-driven treatments requires the ability to assess dystonia severity in a standardized way across centers to facilitate large scale clinical trials. However, current dystonia severity assessments have been criticized for requiring prolonged video recordings or in person assessments (often lasting more than 30 minutes).8,9 This can be both expensive (requiring many personnel hours) and exhausting for people with CP to execute. Furthermore, the longer these severity assessments take, the less feasible they are to execute during routine clinical care, making it difficult to clinically assess the impact of dystonia treatments. Therefore, of the many tasks currently used across dystonia severity assessments, it would be valuable to determine the subset of tasks most useful for assessing dystonia in young people with CP.