Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry · 2013
Intravitreal bevacizumab for ocular metastasis of multiple myeloma.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Zhou Qiang, Liang Jianhong, Lu Hong
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Multiple myeloma is the most common plasma cell tumor; however, ocular plasmacytomas are rare. Few cases of binocular metastasis have been reported. The authors review a case study using intraocular bevacizumab to treat secondary glaucoma and binocular metastasis from multiple myeloma.
CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old woman with a 13-month history of multiple myeloma was found to have a suspected masquerade syndrome OS and subsequently developed a neovascular glaucoma within 2 months. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection OS controlled the intraocular pressure and inhibited ocular metastasis. The methods of therapy administration in this case are consistent with procedures commonly used in clinical practice when using bevacizumab to treat other etiologies, such as choroidal neovascular membranes. Lost to follow-up until 2 months later, the patient presented with ocular metastasis OD with the same changes as observed OS. Conjunctival biopsy revealed subconjunctival plasmoma OD. After intravitreal bevacizumab injection, neovascular glaucoma OD was partly controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary ocular plasmacytoma, despite its rarity, should be considered in patients with multiple myeloma. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection may be a promising treatment for ocular metastases and associated secondary or neovascular glaucoma.
CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old woman with a 13-month history of multiple myeloma was found to have a suspected masquerade syndrome OS and subsequently developed a neovascular glaucoma within 2 months. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection OS controlled the intraocular pressure and inhibited ocular metastasis. The methods of therapy administration in this case are consistent with procedures commonly used in clinical practice when using bevacizumab to treat other etiologies, such as choroidal neovascular membranes. Lost to follow-up until 2 months later, the patient presented with ocular metastasis OD with the same changes as observed OS. Conjunctival biopsy revealed subconjunctival plasmoma OD. After intravitreal bevacizumab injection, neovascular glaucoma OD was partly controlled.
CONCLUSIONS: Secondary ocular plasmacytoma, despite its rarity, should be considered in patients with multiple myeloma. Intravitreal bevacizumab injection may be a promising treatment for ocular metastases and associated secondary or neovascular glaucoma.