MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/md.0000000000029223

Медицинская библиотека · Medicine · 2022

Repeated intracerebral hemorrhage after craniotomy for a distal middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A case report.

Feng Yan, Ji MingJun, Ren Yufeng, Liu Ziqian, Xin Zhenxue, Wang Liqun

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

RATIONALE: Distal middle cerebral artery aneurysms are very rare in the clinic, and craniotomy clipping is the better treatment after diagnosis. However, patients can also have repeated acute intracerebral hemorrhage after craniotomy for aneurysm, which has not been previously reported.

PATIENT CONCERNS: A 24-year-old male patient was admitted to our hospital with headache, nausea, and vomiting. He was well before, had no family history of cerebrovascular disease or hypertension, and had no history of trauma.

DIAGNOSES: Computer tomography and digital subtraction angiography of the brain revealed intracranial hematoma and an aneurysm located at the M4 segment of the left middle cerebral artery.

INTERVENTIONS: The patient underwent 2 surgeries to treat the aneurysm, followed by 2 operations for acute cerebral hemorrhage.

OUTCOMES: Despite repeated surgical treatments, the patient had a poor prognosis and eventually died of respiratory and circulatory failure after repeated brain bleeding.

LESSONS: Briefly, it is of great importance to consider the risk factors of cerebral hemorrhage, and provide individualized treatment and psychological counseling for patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.

Для цитирования: Feng Yan, Ji MingJun, Ren Yufeng, Liu Ziqian, Xin Zhenxue, Wang Liqun. Repeated intracerebral hemorrhage after craniotomy for a distal middle cerebral artery aneurysm: A case report.. Medicine. 2022. DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000029223.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.