American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2022
Regression of corneal opacity and neovascularization in Stevens-Johnson syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis with the use of prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment.
Клинический случайСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Liao Jennifer, Asghari Bita, Carrasquillo Karen G
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To report two cases demonstrating the regression of corneal neovascularization and clearing of corneal opacification in patients with Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) undergoing prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem (PROSE) treatment.
OBSERVATIONS: Four eyes of 2 patients were analyzed. Regression of neovascularization and clearing of corneal opacification was observed in both patients. All 4 eyes demonstrated improvement in visual acuity with treatment. With treatment, both patients ultimately discontinued all prescribed topical therapies. It was discovered upon review of these cases that all 4 eyes were managed with PROSE devices designed with back-surface channeled haptics.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: There currently is no known literature reporting on long-term regression of corneal neovascularization or clearing of corneal opacity in SJS or TEN patients with the use of scleral prosthetic devices. This report of 2 cases highlights the improvement in corneal function with PROSE treatment involving the use of channeled designs in patients with SJS or TEN. More research is needed to better understand how PROSE or scleral lens design features affect patient outcomes and why some patients may show regression in corneal neovascularization.
OBSERVATIONS: Four eyes of 2 patients were analyzed. Regression of neovascularization and clearing of corneal opacification was observed in both patients. All 4 eyes demonstrated improvement in visual acuity with treatment. With treatment, both patients ultimately discontinued all prescribed topical therapies. It was discovered upon review of these cases that all 4 eyes were managed with PROSE devices designed with back-surface channeled haptics.
CONCLUSIONS AND IMPORTANCE: There currently is no known literature reporting on long-term regression of corneal neovascularization or clearing of corneal opacity in SJS or TEN patients with the use of scleral prosthetic devices. This report of 2 cases highlights the improvement in corneal function with PROSE treatment involving the use of channeled designs in patients with SJS or TEN. More research is needed to better understand how PROSE or scleral lens design features affect patient outcomes and why some patients may show regression in corneal neovascularization.