MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.045

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS · 2007

Results of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face.

Zaal Laura H, van der Horst Chantal M

Оценочное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

SUMMARY

INTRODUCTION

Giant congenital melanocytic naevi (GCMN) are uncommon, have a significant morbidity and require extensive treatment. This paper presents results after complete excision of GCMN on the scalp, forehead or periorbita after early tissue expansion. Based on 15 years of experience, we want to show that performing tissue expansion at a young age is advisable.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We included 17 consecutive patients in whom 38 tissue expanders were used. Early and late complications were noted. Patients were seen for a clinical follow up in which scars and re-pigmentation were evaluated with a validated scar scale (POSAS).

RESULTS

All GCMN could be excised completely with early tissue expansion. The age at treatment ranged from 4 months to 2 years of age. With a mean follow-up period of 8.7 years, mild re-pigmentation was seen in only three patients and none of the patients developed a malignant melanoma. Complication rates are comparable with the literature.

CONCLUSION

Tissue expansion is a good method for removing GCMN located at the scalp or face with good cosmetic and oncological results. Performing tissue expansion at a young age is advisable.

Для цитирования: Zaal Laura H, van der Horst Chantal M. Results of the early use of tissue expansion for giant congenital melanocytic naevi on the scalp and face.. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2007. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.10.045.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.