MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.02.007

Медицинская библиотека · Parkinsonism & related disorders · 2012

The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale: reliability in neurologists and physiotherapists.

Boyce Melani J, Canning Colleen G, Mahant Neil, Morris John, Latimer Jane, Fung Victor S C

СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Inter-rater reliability for the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale has been determined for neurologists, but not for physiotherapists. We assessed the inter-rater reliability of scoring the clinical severity subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale by two physiotherapists and two neurologists.

METHODS

Seven individuals with cervical dystonia were assessed on video a total of 23 times. The assessments were randomized and rated by all raters.

RESULTS

Reliability for all raters considered together, assessed by the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC 2,1) was 0.74 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.46-0.88). Reliability for the two clinician groups was not significantly different: neurologists ICC (2,1) = 0.75 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.44-0.89), physiotherapists ICC (2,1) = 0.82 (p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.30-0.94).

CONCLUSION

The clinical severity subscale of the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale can be assessed with good inter-rater reliability when physiotherapists and neurologists are represented in the same rater pool.

Для цитирования: Boyce Melani J, Canning Colleen G, Mahant Neil, Morris John, Latimer Jane, Fung Victor S C. The Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale: reliability in neurologists and physiotherapists.. Parkinsonism & related disorders. 2012. DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2012.02.007.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.