Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2026
Ivabradine in Heart Transplant Recipients with Sinus Tachycardia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
СтатьяСистематический обзорМетаанализНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hamzah Khadeeja Ali, Kurmasha Yousif Hameed, Rasheed Waleed Mohaned, Al-Shammari Ali Saad, Shahzaib Muhammad, Akoum Atef, Shweliya Mohammedsadeq A, Ramadan Alaa, Al-Taii Haider, Refaat Marwan M
Аннотация
Sinus tachycardia is common after heart transplantation (HTx) and may worsen graft function through increased oxygen demand and remodeling. Ivabradine, a selective If channel inhibitor, lowers heart rate (HR) independently of sympathetic activity. This meta-analysis evaluates its efficacy and safety versus standard care in HTx recipients. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, WoS, Scopus, and Cochrane was conducted through September 2025. Eligible studies included randomized and nonrandomized comparative trials. Data were pooled with a random-effects model to estimate mean differences for continuous outcomes and risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes. Six studies, including 852 adult HTx recipients, were included. Ivabradine consistently reduced HR across all time points. Statistical significance was reached at 24 months (MD -16.82 bpm; P = 0.04) and 36 months (MD -12.94 bpm; P = 0.04). A significant reduction was observed in left ventricular mass index (MD -11.10 g/m 2 ; 95% confidence interval -17.15 to -5.06; P < 0.05; I^2 = 0%). While left ventricular mass (LVM) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) showed trends toward improvement at the final follow-up (MD = -11.23 for LVM and +2.94% for LVEF), neither reached statistical significance ( P = 0.06 and P = 0.48, respectively). No significant differences were found between the ivabradine and control groups regarding all-cause mortality (RR 1.16 at the final follow-up; P = 0.90), graft rejection (RR 1.14; P = 0.87), or systolic blood pressure (MD 0.50 mm Hg; P = 0.83). Ivabradine lowers HR after HTx but shows no clear benefit on mortality, rejection, or ejection fraction. It does not significantly affect blood pressure, supporting its tolerability, particularly when beta-blockers are not tolerated.